Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hey, since you created that article, I suggest adding it to the list of accidents and incidents involving commercial aircraft since this incident now has an article. Writing because I'm not sure how you feel about it Nagito Komaeda the Second (talk) 17:13, 7 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAL Airlines Flight 2259 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Also wanted to add, writing an article is an extremely difficult challenge and steep learning curve! Kudos to you for creating one! I only began writing articles (including some on aviation) a few months back! I recommend checking out WP:AfC and submitting some through there to see how you get on! If you need any assistance, I would be happy to help! 11WB (talk) 09:59, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
You tagged Draft:KLM Flight 1204 for speedy deletion, which applied only to "a page where the author of the only substantial content has requested deletion". You do not qualify to tag the article as there are other author. —ERcheck (talk) 14:38, 17 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Thanks for your contributions to Aeroflot Flight 8175. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeroflot Flight 8175 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Aviaco Flight 231, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Wisenerd, left the following feedback:
Hello, Ohok12!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wisenerd (talk) 00:47, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Aviationwikiflight, left the following feedback:
Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.
Whilst this could in theory be a notable crash, in its current form, this draft cannot be moved into mainspace. The following is a non-exhaustive list of problems regarding this draft:
– The §Lawsuit section is nearly entirely unsourced;
– tailstrike.com is used numerous times in this article, which appears to be an unreliable, since for one, it doesn't really cite any sources;
– I don't see anything that lends credence to sources #7, #8 (a forum...), and #9;
– None of the information given at §Crew is verified in the cited source;
– This source that is used does not verify any of the information that it is cited to;
– russianplanes.net is not a reliable source; etc...
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Malév Flight 641, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for your contributions to LOT Polish Airlines Flight 149. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TBB (talk) 07:17, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Latest comment: 30 days ago13 comments3 people in discussion
LLM prods may be only be removed after an editor [assumes] responsibility for the content which first requires that all content and its sources be closely reviewed, and reworked as needed, to ensure that they comply with polices and guidelines per the objection process. This deprod did not follow the objection process as unverified information was left in the article. fifteenthousandtwohundredtwentyfour(talk) 06:29, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
And again with this deprod, a spot check quickly caught Five people died instantly from the impact with trees. Due to extreme cold, another six people succumbed to hypothermia before rescuers arrived. as failing verification. I'll emphasize that all content and sources must be checked and corrected first. To that end, how did you get access to O rastro da bruxa: história da aviação comercial brasileira no século XX através dos seus acidentes? fifteenthousandtwohundredtwentyfour(talk) 12:20, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I recall only adding ru.airdisaster not that Brazilian reference, maybe my phone lagged. Sorry for the inconvenience. Ohok12 (talk) 12:25, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh yes, I saw that. I apologized for that because I forgot to delete that site, thanks for reminding me. BTW, can you checked some of my dePROD in my contribution too, I believe I may have forgot to delete unverified details, thank you. Ohok12 (talk) 12:33, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I just spot-checked Aeroflot Flight 145 after it was deprodded again and found more WP:V issues in a minute.
I appreciate your interest in tying to save these pages, but I'm going to have to ask that you stop deprodding for now. I keep finding verification issues in the remaining text, this is not acceptable as per WP:LLMPRVOBJ it's required that first all content and its sources be closely reviewed, and reworked as needed, to ensure that they comply with polices and guidelines. This has failed to happen many times across many pages now, please stop. fifteenthousandtwohundredtwentyfour(talk) 13:25, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
The LLMPROD tags should probably be followed, since LLMPRVOBJ has not been followed and these articles are still LLM-generated text. Ohok12 may not have realised that they were taking responsibility for these pages and the LLM-generated text, the de-LLMPRODDING rationale sounds more like they were thinking of either G15 or regular PROD tags. ‐‐gurkubondinn15:34, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ah, nevermind. I see that it's been restored in Special:Diff/1362516638 for Malév Flight 203. Are you taking responsibility for the rest of them? Seems like at least some of them still have source integrity issues.
If you want these incidents to have articles, you are far better off by writing new articles from scratch after these have been deleted. ‐‐gurkubondinn15:39, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I would actually want them to be stayed. It just that most of Aeroflot crashes were being undersourced (only containing databases) due to the Soviet censorship. Ohok12 (talk) 16:32, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I'm aware. There's some interesting Aeroflot (and Soviet in general) incidents and accidents. This is definitely a notable interesting topic, I just don't think we should have LLM-generated articles on them because LLM-generated text is about as credible as a mouldy carrot. ‐‐gurkubondinn20:38, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 30 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Nfutvol, left the following feedback:
provide significant coverage: discuss the event in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
show lasting significance: analysis published after the initial breaking news has passed, showing historical impact;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the event, such as press releases, the event or organizers own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all four of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Sourcing does not demonstrate notability per the WP:NEVENT guideline. Sourcing must show lasting coverage of the event, with in-depth coverage of the event in reliable, secondary sources. Additionally, the sourcing provided includes dead links, old dates, and other indicators of possible LLM usage.
Latest comment: 27 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, EaglesFan37, left the following feedback:
Latest comment: 21 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Aeroflot Flight 846, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Actually, I read through its corresponding Portuguese article and I doubt these two would make, normally because its lack of WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. Meanwhile, the VASP Flight 233, athough also lack of WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE, had its impact proven, so that's the reason while I need permission of that. Anyway, thanks for that, I'll try me best to find more source of that. Ohok12 (talk) 00:23, 18 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Aeroflot Flight 6246, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.
Future articles
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Latest comment: 6 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Nfutvol, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Coverage limited to reporting immediately after the crash. As there appears to be little additional information of note other than the "fact-of" the incident, it can be appropriately covered under the Accidents and incidents section of Sheremetyevo Airport.
Latest comment: 3 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Nfutvol, left the following feedback:
Poor LLM translation. Please fix grammatical errors and issues before submitting. The extensive grammatical issues lead me to believe that the article was not appropriately reviewed after LLM translation, as is required by WP:LLMT. Additionally, the notability is not established, as there is not a significant amount of continuing coverage after the crash.
Latest comment: 3 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
Please wait until the translation review is done to resubmit.
Latest comment: 3 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Hurricane Wind and Fire, left the following feedback:
Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.
This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
In the Rescue section, avoid dramatic language and portray all information factually and neutrally. Also, please find sources for the Aircraft section. Sources must be present no later than the end of the paragraph of the information they support.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.
Future articles
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Latest comment: 2 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Aviaco Flight 331, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.
Future articles
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Latest comment: 1 day ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
Latest comment: 1 day ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Thank you sourcing that final section. I took a look at it, unfortunately it does not look like even with that this will meet the standard of WP:AIRCRASH for a standalone article. My recommendation would be to report on the crash on the Skyway Enterprises page. Cheers.
Latest comment: 21 hours ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Nfutvol, left the following feedback:
No changes since last decline. Further submissions without addressing the notability issues will result in the article being rejected.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.
Future articles
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Latest comment: 4 hours ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Aeroflot Flight 35, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.
Future articles
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
