User talk:Northern Pirozhki

Stop icon Your recent editing history at Papers Please shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war . This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. ThomasO1989 (talk) 03:23, 18 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Papers please terrorist attack short film.gif . The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 19 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

[画像:Information icon] Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ThomasO1989 (talk) 18:13, 23 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 18:55, 23 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Papers, Please terrorist attack short film.webm . The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:49, 23 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

Your account is blocked again, for 2 weeks this time. Do not return directly to edit warning after being blocked for edit warring. Sergecross73 msg me 03:18, 27 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

Stop icon You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Voiced palatal approximant. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Nardog (talk) 09:54, 12 February 2026 (UTC) Reply

The redirect Police! help! Police! help! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 12 §Police! help! Police! help! until a consensus is reached. Epicgenius (talk) 14:28, 12 February 2026 (UTC) Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Adolf Hitler No Offense.webm . The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:05, 2 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

The redirect Say "goose," you stupid freak. *Ralph runs away while crying* has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 22 §Say "goose," you stupid freak. *Ralph runs away while crying* until a consensus is reached. ... discospinster _talk 02:00, 22 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

The redirect Duck, duck, duck, duck, duck, duck, duck, duck... has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 22 §Duck, duck, duck, duck, duck, duck, duck, duck... until a consensus is reached. ... discospinster _talk 02:01, 22 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

The redirect Well, I don't need safety gloves, because I'm Homer Simp-*gets zapped* has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 22 §Well, I don't need safety gloves, because I'm Homer Simp-*gets zapped* until a consensus is reached. ... discospinster _talk 02:02, 22 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

The redirect Owww, my legs! This is the worst pain ever! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 22 §Owww, my legs! This is the worst pain ever! until a consensus is reached. ... discospinster _talk 02:02, 22 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Stupid Sexy Flanders.gif . The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 10:44, 22 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Frank Grimes death.webm . The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 05:53, 23 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Hans Moleman hit by football.webm . The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 06:21, 23 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

I know Wikipedia can be a difficult website to learn, but I'm getting increasingly concerned that you keep making the same issues without any real effort to change or improve.

1. You've been blocked twice for edit warring, and have since received another warning about it.
2. It appears you keep uploading images and videos without making any effort to understand our policies like WP:IUP and WP:NFCC.
3. You keep creating redirects that are, quite frankly, not even close to appropriate.

Unless you really start addressing these issues, engaging with others concerns, etc, you're headed towards a long-term block. If you have questions, ask them, whether its here or help places like the teahouse. But you've got to correct course here. Sergecross73 msg me 17:03, 24 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

Information icon Hi Northern Pirozhki! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. ~ oklopfer (💬) 12:19, 17 April 2026 (UTC) Reply

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences→ Editing→ Editor→ Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Nardog (talk) 07:25, 29 April 2026 (UTC) Reply

Thanks for uploading File:National Geography restricted print.jpeg . The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 28 April 2026 (UTC) Reply

Information icon Hi Northern Pirozhki! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Nardog (talk) 02:53, 2 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

Hi. Please read Wikipedia guidelines on "defining" before creating any more categories. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so categories about spelling and words are usually inappropriate. Poorly focussed categories (What makes a silent letter "rare"?) are also rarely helpful to anyone, and rely on original research. Thanks. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 15:52, 23 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Words with silent Q indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:13, 23 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

Category:Fictional characters who are unlucky has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:08, 30 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

Category:Fictional characters with extremely bad luck has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:08, 30 June 2026 (UTC) Reply