User talk:MarioSoulTruthFan

Hello, I have nominated Kanye West's third studio album Graduation for GT status if you would care to comment? K. Peake 08:37, 27 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Sure thing! No problem in supporting amazing work! MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:05, 27 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I have actually now brought Yeezus to a GT nomination too, if this would interest you to comment? --K. Peake 19:50, 5 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Congrats! You got it! MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:11, 16 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Thank you so much! That was not an easy task! MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 01:16, 23 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

You are restoring to the Bruno Mars article text that is overly detailed and promotional to the extreme. Please desist from such disruptive editing. In your latest attempt to restore previously deleted content, you described disingenuously the deletion as "vandalism"; it was not vandalism but clean up. -The Gnome (talk) The Gnome (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

THE GOCE went over it and fixed the issues. The issues for you "it has more words than mozard"...makes no sense MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:34, 18 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

The GOCE is not the final arbiter here. I pointed out the relevance of weight in every article, pointing out the respective size of the Mozart article. If you, on the other hand, are of the opinion that Mars is a far more important musical artist than Mozart, please explain why. -The Gnome (talk) 12:05, 18 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your contributions to Wikipedia, so far, are overwhelmingly related to the artist Bruno Mars himself and his works. Kindly have a look at this important policy and let us know if you are you in any capacity being paid for these efforts. -The Gnome (talk) 23:25, 15 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Again not paid. Stop annoying me with those questions MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:34, 18 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Why are you annoyed by such a question? As long as you are being honest, this is completely unimportant. But you should still be careful: Pure love of a subject often leads us editors in expressing that love in incorrect ways. For example, fattening up the size of the article on our dear subject with details such as his every small opinion and ambition is incorrect. -The Gnome (talk) 12:08, 18 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

if it is unimportant then why you keep asking the same question over and over again? There is no opinion on the subject, there are achievements he made during his career than you keep erasing MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:16, 18 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

However, I'm doing the changes you suggested for the band section. Cheers, MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:47, 18 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

You were asked that question by me only once, above. You must be confusing me for someone else. In any case, the consensus reached at the discussion about the article's size was that we should trim it down. Your fattening up edits are not only going against consensus but constitute edit warring. You are kindly requested to stop the disruptive editing. -The Gnome (talk) 18:47, 18 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I saw your conversation with another user about me being a paid editor and not coming forward with it. Yes and after the copy edit I've also trim down the article quite a bit for the past few weeks and everyone (but you) was happy with it. It is not on point with what I would like to look like it but it is coming closer to it. You edits have been nothing but disruptive and you have been warned by another user on Mars' talk page. Nevertheless, you chose to ignore it. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 19:29, 19 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]