User talk:Jeeholiday

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jeeholiday! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help ; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Zhang 22:43, 24 February 2026 (UTC) Reply

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Odyssey (2026 film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Paul Tassi is a senior contributor, and most of his articles are sufficiently well cited and editorially analyzed. He meets the threshold to qualify as a subject-matter expert. This ref supports valid commentary. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 04:31, 18 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

Stop icon You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to The Odyssey (2026 film). This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 04:44, 18 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

You went from claiming that Forbes contributors aren't self-published and are allowed under some "commentary" exemption that doesn't exist, to claiming without evidence that some guy who didn't even write the articles is a "subject matter expert", which probably just means that he's a self-published blogger who blogs a lot. Something tells me you just didn't read WP:FORBESCON and its associated discussions properly. Jeeholiday (talk) 05:15, 18 July 2026 (UTC) Reply