User talk:Ilariaunisa
Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately you do not seem to have fully grasped the nature of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, and not a publishing medium for original creative work. Your articles A story (poetry) and The night (poetry) are both unsuitable for this reason, and have been proposed for speedy deletion. Also Rhetor Twigs appears to be about a person who has, as far as I can determine, received no attention anywhere: I can find no evidence of any coverage of him or his works, so this article too is unsuitable, and has been proposed for speedy deletion.
If you wish to know more about editing Wikipedia, here are a few links which you may find useful:
- Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
- Articles must conform to a neutral point of view
- Information should be verifiable
- How to edit a page
- The Wikipedia:Introduction to Wikipedia
- The Tutorial
- The Manual of Style
- What to do if you see vandalism
- How to write a great article
The Rhetor Twigs article contained no evidence that the guy exists let alone that he might be notable. The number of Google hits suggests he is an hoax. Wikipedia does not publish poetry - put it on one of your own websites. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:26, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
A tag has been placed on Dawn (poetry) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon }} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 17:46, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
A tag has been placed on Love sunset (poetry) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon }} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 17:48, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
Please stop creating these poetry articles. Wikipedia is not a webhost.--RadioFan (talk) 17:50, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
A tag has been placed on Peace (poetry) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon }} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 17:51, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. RadioFan (talk) 17:51, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
A tag has been placed on Hands (poetry) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon }} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. SKATER Speak. 17:53, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Rhetor Twigs, you will be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 18:09, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Rhetor Twigs, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 18:10, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
- Further, among the many other issues mentioned above, publishing your friend's poetry here infringes upon his copyrights on the poems. Accordingly, all the articles you have created with his poems have been deleted. —C.Fred (talk) 18:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Reply
Despite all the messages above you continued posting. Can you offer any reason why blocking you is not totally justified? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:19, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Reply