User talk:Igor.Novikov
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sphingosine Kinase 1, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: SK1. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:23, 3 August 2008 (UTC) Reply
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give SK1 a different title by copying its content and pasting it into Sphingosine Kinase 1. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is considered undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Hqb (talk) 13:41, 3 August 2008 (UTC) Reply
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to SK1 (program) , without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Additionally, I need to remind you that you have an evident conflict of interest with regards to this article, and therefore you need to be particularly careful about neutrality . Thanks, Hqb (talk) 15:26, 3 August 2008 (UTC) Reply