User talk:Ian 1975

Welcome!

Hello, Ian 1975, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions .

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article . If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page , where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me }} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:48, 11 October 2017 (UTC) Reply

This is the 1st warning for desruptive editing in article List of the busiest airports in Europe. One cannot delete Russian and Turkish airports at the pretext they are not in Europe and keep at the same time African (Canarian) and Asian (Larnaca) airports in the ranking). Please stop your desruptive editing, otherwise your account may be suspended. Thank you.

This is the 2nd and last warning for desruptive editing in article List of the busiest airports in Europe. One cannot delete Russian and Turkish airports at the pretext they are not in Europe and keep at the same time African (Canarian) and Asian (Larnaca) airports in the ranking). Please stop your desruptive editing, otherwise this will be reported to Administrator and your account may be suspended. Thank you.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kazakhstan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Double sharp (talk) 10:06, 7 January 2019 (UTC) Reply

(talk page stalker) Borat vandalism, really? Waatese (talk) 23:43, 11 January 2019 (UTC) Reply

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kamala Harris. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:14, 23 January 2019 (UTC) Reply

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kamala Harris, you may be blocked from editing. clpo13 _(talk) 19:54, 23 January 2019 (UTC) Reply

You've reverted three times on this article (, , ), so another revert would put you over WP:3RR and likely see you blocked for edit warring, especially if you don't explain your edits and provide sources. clpo13 _(talk) 20:01, 23 January 2019 (UTC) Reply

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aegean Airlines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:27, 28 March 2019 (UTC) Reply

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Air Europa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:47, 24 December 2019 (UTC) Reply

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on SkyUp. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Linking to another Wikipedia article is not sourcing. Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:51, 24 December 2019 (UTC) Reply

Jetstreamer kindly refrain from vandalizing this entry. Get informed instead on the 737MAX situation. Every single one of my edits is sourced.

I strongly suggest you to inform yourself about what vandalism really is before accusing another editor of being a vandal.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC) Reply

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ukraine International Airlines. Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:42, 25 December 2019 (UTC) Reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Air Europa; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:46, 25 December 2019 (UTC) Reply

Regarding this reversion of yours, it is clear that you do not understand the WP:VERIFY policy. Your edit has been reverted (as also this one has been). The next time you reinstate such information in either article without providing sources I will file a report against you both for disruptive editing and for falsely accusing me of vandalism.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 19:53, 3 February 2020 (UTC) Reply

I strongly suggest you to stop treating anyone who is not in agreement with your edits as a vandal .--Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC) Reply

[画像:Information icon] There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User keeps calling vandals at those editors not in agreement with their edits. --Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:43, 17 February 2020 (UTC) Reply

Hello,

You have been temporarily blocked for making repeated personal attacks. You have been making accusations of "vandalism" in content disputes since 2018, particularly in the past few months. This needs to stop. Personal attacks during content disputes are unacceptable. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 02:07, 18 February 2020 (UTC) Reply

It is very poorly written. The article needs a complete rewriting. References are required for assertions. The grammer, spelling, and tense are sub-standard.

What is written is not the problem. HOW it is written ruins the article and the information is lost behind the myriad mistakes. 99.250.25.63 (talk) 18:15, 19 December 2021 (UTC) Reply  

Your recent editing history at Granit Xhaka shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing —especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 14:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC) Reply

Information icon Hello. In a recent edit to the page 2026 FIFA World Cup, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Sounder Bruce 08:48, 30 September 2022 (UTC) Reply

Your recent editing history at 2026 FIFA World Cup shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing —especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Consensus is to use the host country's variety of English; in this case, American and Canadian English both use "soccer". Sounder Bruce 08:19, 1 October 2022 (UTC) Reply

If I might add something: Ian 1975, you falsely accused me of vandalism because you didn’t like my reverting your edit. You need to stop doing that. I can see from both your block log and further up on this very talk page that you’ve previously been blocked for exactly that same sort of conduct. Disagreement with your edit doesn’t mean you automatically win and that anyone else is vandalizing an article. If you sincerely disagree, take it to the article's talk page. I don’t know that it will help your cause in this case because the issue has been discussed in the past and WP:CONSENSUS was to use the word "soccer" when the World Cup is played in countries that call the sport by that name, but nothing's preventing you from reopening the issue. 1995hoo (talk) 15:53, 2 October 2022 (UTC) Reply

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Revolutionary Organization 17 November, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 21:29, 14 September 2023 (UTC) Reply

I am stating facts. 17N is a terrorist organization and its members convicted for dozens of acts of terrorism. Ian 1975 (talk) 08:32, 16 September 2023 (UTC) Reply

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Revolutionary Organization 17 November. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 14:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC) Reply

Please stop threatening me and instead accept the facts of the matter. 17N is a terrorist group. Ian 1975 (talk) 08:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC) Reply

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Revolutionary Organization 17 November, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 15:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC) Reply

Kid stop threatening people. Grow up! Ian 1975 (talk) 16:08, 19 September 2023 (UTC) Reply

Knock it off Given your editing history, and this latest fairly brazen disruption, this is likely to be your last block with an expiration date. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC) Reply

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Talk:Nationwide opinion polling for the 2024 United States presidential election, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 13:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC) Reply

Please assume responsibility and try to explain why the most accurate poll aggregator for all the recent elections was removed.

And what changed and you restored it.

It seems it was motivated by partisanship. It looks and walks like a duck. I'm open to any other explanation and I am more than willing to entertain any of your thoughts on the matter. Ian 1975 (talk) 17:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC) Reply

Please do not delete sources when you're editing a list, like in multiple edits of List of largest airlines in Europe, just add a new link additionally as necessary. Respublik (talk) 14:06, 26 January 2025 (UTC) Reply

Information icon Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bucharest Henri Coandă International Airport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. All routes need sources - additionally please note that Aeroroutes isn’t a reliable source per WP:AEROROUTES Danners430 _{tweaks made} 12:44, 2 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

Information icon Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Paphos International Airport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 15:12, 16 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Zvartnots International Airport, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can Zvartnots_International_Airport&preloadparams%5b%5d=1336965891"}]]}">report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:51, 6 February 2026 (UTC) Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Norfolk International Airport, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can Norfolk_International_Airport&preloadparams%5b%5d=1337171600"}]]}">report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:29, 7 February 2026 (UTC) Reply

@Ian 1975 the source you provided at Athens International Airport is malformed because it looks like it came from some unknown Chrome extension. Can you sort it? Danners430 _{tweaks made} 10:38, 9 February 2026 (UTC) Reply

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Southwest Florida International Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 18:57, 17 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rhodes International Airport, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can Rhodes_International_Airport&preloadparams%5b%5d=1349883560"}]]}">report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:23, 19 April 2026 (UTC) Reply

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Athens International Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 15:35, 5 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

Dude you need to chill. Really. The source is ALAYS Athens Airports own page and it is clearly visible on the top side of the table. As it always have been. So please, stop behaving to other users who are contributing factual info in such a manner. Thank you. Ian 1975 (talk) 16:01, 5 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

The most recent source on that table is from 8 May. Perhaps you can explain how that verifies statistics from the whole of May? And the reason this is a level 3 warning is because this is the third time this has happened with yourself - aka the third notice on your talk page. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 16:03, 5 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

If you had bothered to actually click on the source it would take you to the airport's statistics page which ALWAYS is automatically updated to the most recent data. Even if the link is a decade old it will show you the latest data. There is no different link from one month or one year to the next.

https://www.aia.gr/en/corporate/facts-and-figures Ian 1975 (talk) 17:00, 6 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

Yes that's great - however the citation that is there is dated 8 May. If that is the source you used to update the figures, then you must update that date. I'm not a mind reader, neither are other readers - if you use a source, it's your responsibility to update it accordingly. In this case it's not a URL change that's required, but an access date change. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 17:28, 6 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

Just to expand - this isn't anything revolutionary or being nitpicky... it's basic verifiability. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 17:32, 6 June 2026 (UTC) Reply