Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

User talk:Great Zongo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit ]
Latest comment: 10 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! JTtheOG (talk) 05:44, 17 September 2025 (UTC) Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit ]
Latest comment: 8 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page . If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM }} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC) Reply

Nomination of Pure Wickedness for deletion

[edit ]
Latest comment: 7 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pure Wickedness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pure Wickedness until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

11WB (talk) 09:57, 13 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

Blood Rights moved to draftspace

[edit ]
Latest comment: 6 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for your contributions to Blood Rights. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 23:34, 21 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

Reliable sources

[edit ]
Latest comment: 4 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Please ensure you include reliable sources when adding content to articles; this is especially important when editing biographies of living persons. Thank you, -- Ponyo bons mots 23:14, 23 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

Snap (TV series) moved to draftspace

[edit ]
Latest comment: 4 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for your contributions to Snap (TV series). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Please do not use IMDb as reference. See WP:IMDb . I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SatnaamIN (talk) 02:06, 27 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

April 2026

[edit ]
Latest comment: 3 months ago 2 comments1 person in discussion

Information icon Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 1992 in British television, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 01:08, 23 April 2026 (UTC) Reply

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wacaday, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 14:03, 30 April 2026 (UTC) Reply

Come Home, Charlie, and Face Them (TV series) moved to draftspace

[edit ]
Latest comment: 3 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for your contributions to Come Home, Charlie, and Face Them (TV series). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. m s k 02:31, 4 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

May 2026

[edit ]
Latest comment: 2 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Information icon Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 1990 in British television, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 00:17, 31 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blood Rights (July 3)

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 month ago 2 comments1 person in discussion
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Dan arndt, left the following feedback:
This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
  • Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
  • Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage : discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable : from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent : not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Fails WP:NTELEVISION - IMDb is not an acceptable or reliable secondary source and the BBC website is a primary source.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Blood Rights to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Dan arndt (talk) 04:34, 3 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Great Zongo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk . If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse , a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:34, 3 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bretts (TV Series) has been accepted

[edit ]
Latest comment: 27 days ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
The Bretts (TV Series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:29, 17 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 5 § Television series debuts and endings by year on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d ) 08:22, 5 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Snap (TV series) (August 7)

[edit ]
Latest comment: 5 days ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Zxcvbnm, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage : discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable : from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent : not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Not clear that it passes WP:GNG. Wikipedia is not a directory.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Snap (TV series) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 23:53, 7 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Snap (TV series) has been accepted

[edit ]
Latest comment: 3 days ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
Snap (TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 20:25, 10 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blood Rights has been accepted

[edit ]
Latest comment: 2 days ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
Blood Rights, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Wikiediter2029 (talk) Nosey? Stalk My edits 23:25, 10 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit ]
Latest comment: 2 days ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Great Zongo. Thank you for your work on Blood Rights. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more secondary sources and establish notability as per WP:GNG. Thanks and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamneireach out 🕊️ 10:09, 11 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Freddie and Max (TV Series) (August 12)

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 day ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Brynn Who Likes Editing, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage : discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable : from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent : not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
BFI sources do not make it more notable, because it's an indiscriminate index for TV show. The other two sources aren't well known and do not generate any discussion on the TV show, they only so much as mention its existence, go on two more paragraphs and end. If you have better sources, please use them. Sorry for the decline. Thanks for listening.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Freddie and Max (TV Series) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

In solidarity, Brynn Who Likes Editing | talk w/ me! 09:41, 12 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Freddie and Max (TV Series) (August 12)

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 day ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Absurdum4242, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage : discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable : from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent : not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Same issue as before. in order to prove notability, an article needs to references 2-3 sources which are reliable, independent, secondary sources, which talk about the subject of the Wikipedia article at length. This article has none. Until this is fixed, no number of resubmits will help this article get approved.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Freddie and Max (TV Series) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Absurdum4242 (talk) 15:27, 12 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Freddie and Max (TV Series) has been accepted

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 day ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
Freddie and Max (TV Series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 20:20, 12 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2026 Thai television series endings

[edit ]
Latest comment: 10 hours ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

A tag has been placed on Category:2026 Thai television series endings indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 11:56, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Come Home, Charlie, and Face Them (TV series) (August 13)

[edit ]
Latest comment: 4 minutes ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage : discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable : from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent : not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Subject may very well be notable, but sources don't demonstrate that.

Next steps

Need help?

Scam warning

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:40, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /