User talk:Foobarnix

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC) Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC) Reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of climate change deniers. Since you had some involvement with the List of climate change deniers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Dmcq (talk) 00:27, 14 July 2016 (UTC) Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrej Bauer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrej Bauer (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 15:52, 24 August 2016 (UTC) Reply

I see you've added virtual-history.com to articles in the past. I'm trying to figure out what the site is and when, if ever, it belongs in articles. Any help would be welcome. I've yet to find any discussion about it amidst thousands of links, though it was brought up as possible spam once but didn't get any responses at the time. --Ronz (talk) 19:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC) Reply

I do not recall when I added virtual-history to articles although I suppose I did. Can you link me to an article where I did this and then I can be more helpful.

It was a long time ago, but maybe this will help --Ronz (talk) 15:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC) Reply

Here is the main page of virtual history. It appears to be one of the many film and movie star data bases that exist on the web. In my experience, it has a lot of nice details about film people, etc. That is about all I know about it.

Thanks. I think you're right, though it looks it was created with a complete disregard to copyrights of any kind, so I assume any concern about facts is poor as well.

I'm going to slowly work toward treating it as spam, starting at ELN just to see if anyone had past experience with it or has other ideas what it might be. Thanks again. --Ronz (talk) 15:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC) Reply

Category:Disc golf courses in Charlotte, North Carolina , which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 16:13, 11 January 2020 (UTC) Reply

Hi, I was about to move McGill Rose Garden (Charlotte, North Carolina) and noticed your instruction at the shorter redirect page. This would seem to violate WP:CONCISE. Is there some kind of discussion or local consensus I should know about? The longer name would appear to be unjustified. 162 etc. (talk) 17:11, 21 May 2022 (UTC) Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Theatre companies in Hawaii indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:06, 3 December 2022 (UTC) Reply

Category:Iraqi coppersmiths has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 14:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC) Reply

Category:Scottish coppersmiths has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:45, 2 March 2024 (UTC) Reply

Category:English coppersmiths has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC) Reply

Category:Dutch coppersmiths has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:51, 2 March 2024 (UTC) Reply

Hello, Foobarnix. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Article builder 1".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Broom and a Mop (talk) 01:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC) Reply

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 2 § Theatres by populated place on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 05:08, 2 February 2025 (UTC) Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Homotopy type theory, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homotopy type theory until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 April 2026 (UTC) Reply

The redirect Nevin Community Park has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 13 §Nevin Community Park until a consensus is reached. Qwerty123M (talk) 02:25, 13 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

The redirect Nevin Community Park (Charlotte, North Carolina) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 20 §Nevin Community Park (Charlotte, North Carolina) until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:24, 20 May 2026 (UTC) Reply