User talk:FieldArchivist
Welcome!
[edit ]Hello, FieldArchivist, and welcome to Wikipedia ! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse .
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz Read! Talk! 22:18, 27 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
July 2025
[edit ]Information icon Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Virgin Gorda, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The sources used for the edit about Drake and Hawkins are not reliable sources. Donald Albury 22:35, 26 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Hi Donald, thanks again for the earlier feedback on the Virgin Gorda article regarding the Drake and Hawkins reference. I’ve revised the content with more cautious wording, and added a citation to the Virgin Islands Culture & Heritage Policy & Strategy 2023, published by the Government of the Virgin Islands.
- I’m still fairly new here, so I really appreciate your guidance. I hope the new version meets Wikipedia’s standards. Happy to make further changes if needed. Thanks again. FieldArchivist (talk) 00:59, 27 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- I know how tempting it is to use such sites, and I did use some back when I started editing almost 20 years ago, but I have found that such sites all too often repeat garbled versions of facts or even "facts" invented for promotional purposes. The community has gotten stricter about sources over the years. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard can be helpful if you have questions about a potential source. Google Scholar can be helpful when looking for sources. As it works out, I spend more time searching for and studying reliable sources then I do adding content. Anyway, thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, and I hope you find joy in doing so. Donald Albury 12:20, 27 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Great advice! I really appreciate the feedback and your time. I’m enjoying learning the ropes here and look forward to continuing to make thoughtful contributions to the Wikipedia community. FieldArchivist (talk) 17:31, 27 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- I know how tempting it is to use such sites, and I did use some back when I started editing almost 20 years ago, but I have found that such sites all too often repeat garbled versions of facts or even "facts" invented for promotional purposes. The community has gotten stricter about sources over the years. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard can be helpful if you have questions about a potential source. Google Scholar can be helpful when looking for sources. As it works out, I spend more time searching for and studying reliable sources then I do adding content. Anyway, thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, and I hope you find joy in doing so. Donald Albury 12:20, 27 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
[edit ]A barnstar for you!
[edit ]- Thanks for the Barnstar, Tony! I really appreciate it as I’m learning the ropes here. FieldArchivist (talk) 02:01, 27 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Your submission at Articles for creation: IX Art Park (November 4)
[edit ]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IX Art Park and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk , on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
AfC notification: Draft:Strategic Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Reserve has a new comment
[edit ]AfC notification: Draft:Strategic Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Reserve has a new comment
[edit ]Your submission at Articles for creation: Strategic Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Reserve has been accepted
[edit ]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
ChrysGalley (talk) 20:55, 5 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit ]Hi FieldArchivist. Thank you for your work on Strategic Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Reserve. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for using the AfC process to create this page; well-warranted and clear. As you will have noticed as part of the AfC, some of the references have been removed (not reliable), so some of the contents could not do with more reliable sourcing.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk) 20:28, 10 February 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
Concern regarding Draft:IX Art Park
[edit ]Information icon Hello, FieldArchivist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:IX Art Park, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:09, 6 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
Your draft article, Draft:IX Art Park
[edit ]Hello, FieldArchivist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "IX Art Park".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 14:54, 4 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]