Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

User talk:FieldArchivist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit ]
A plate of chocolate chip cookies.
Welcome!

Hello, FieldArchivist, and welcome to Wikipedia ! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse .

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz Read! Talk! 22:18, 27 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

July 2025

[edit ]

Information icon Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Virgin Gorda, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The sources used for the edit about Drake and Hawkins are not reliable sources. Donald Albury 22:35, 26 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi Donald, thanks again for the earlier feedback on the Virgin Gorda article regarding the Drake and Hawkins reference. I’ve revised the content with more cautious wording, and added a citation to the Virgin Islands Culture & Heritage Policy & Strategy 2023, published by the Government of the Virgin Islands.
I’m still fairly new here, so I really appreciate your guidance. I hope the new version meets Wikipedia’s standards. Happy to make further changes if needed. Thanks again. FieldArchivist (talk) 00:59, 27 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
I know how tempting it is to use such sites, and I did use some back when I started editing almost 20 years ago, but I have found that such sites all too often repeat garbled versions of facts or even "facts" invented for promotional purposes. The community has gotten stricter about sources over the years. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard can be helpful if you have questions about a potential source. Google Scholar can be helpful when looking for sources. As it works out, I spend more time searching for and studying reliable sources then I do adding content. Anyway, thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, and I hope you find joy in doing so. Donald Albury 12:20, 27 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Great advice! I really appreciate the feedback and your time. I’m enjoying learning the ropes here and look forward to continuing to make thoughtful contributions to the Wikipedia community. FieldArchivist (talk) 17:31, 27 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

[edit ]
Teahouse logo
Hello! FieldArchivist, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 22:20, 27 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

A barnstar for you!

[edit ]
The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your work at Green chemistry :) tony 01:31, 27 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Thanks for the Barnstar, Tony! I really appreciate it as I’m learning the ropes here. FieldArchivist (talk) 02:01, 27 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IX Art Park (November 4)

[edit ]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Earth605 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved. Earth605 talk 14:55, 4 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Strategic Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Reserve. Thanks! MmeMaigret (talk) 01:59, 6 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Strategic Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Reserve. Thanks! ChrysGalley (talk) 20:42, 5 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Strategic Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Reserve, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 20:55, 5 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit ]

Hi FieldArchivist. Thank you for your work on Strategic Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Reserve. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for using the AfC process to create this page; well-warranted and clear. As you will have noticed as part of the AfC, some of the references have been removed (not reliable), so some of the contents could not do with more reliable sourcing.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 20:28, 10 February 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Concern regarding Draft:IX Art Park

[edit ]

Information icon Hello, FieldArchivist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:IX Art Park, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:09, 6 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Your draft article, Draft:IX Art Park

[edit ]

Hello, FieldArchivist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "IX Art Park".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 14:54, 4 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /