Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

User talk:Dexterwasp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 19 hours ago by MCE89 in topic August 2026

May 2026

[edit source ]
Latest comment: 3 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Ayah Bdeir. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Realtent (talk) 17:06, 1 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bright SG Limited (May 1)

[edit source ]
Latest comment: 3 months ago 2 comments1 person in discussion
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Pythoncoder, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

  • hallucinations : they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
  • unencyclopedic tone : they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
  • copyright issues : they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Bright SG Limited to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:24, 1 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Dexterwasp! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk . If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse , a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:24, 1 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

Southwest Solutions Group moved to draftspace

[edit source ]
Latest comment: 3 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for your contributions to Southwest Solutions Group. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster talk 17:56, 6 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tekmetric (May 6)

[edit source ]
Latest comment: 3 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, MSK, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage : discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable : from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent : not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Tekmetric to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

m s k 20:21, 6 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

Nomination of Alexander Bothe for deletion

[edit source ]
Latest comment: 2 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander Bothe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Bothe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Lone Wolf howl 08:53, 13 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

CS1 error on Chandao Nina Nantha

[edit source ]
Latest comment: 1 month ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Chandao Nina Nantha, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can Chandao_Nina_Nantha&preloadparams%5b%5d=1360009616"}]]}">report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:55, 18 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

CS1 error on Álvaro Clavijo Martínez

[edit source ]
Latest comment: 1 month ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Álvaro Clavijo Martínez, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can %C3%81lvaro_Clavijo_Mart%C3%ADnez&preloadparams%5b%5d=1362390322"}]]}">report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:33, 3 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

Nomination of Roxana Rose Daneshjou for deletion

[edit source ]
Latest comment: 26 days ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roxana Rose Daneshjou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxana Rose Daneshjou until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Jerod Lycett (talk) 12:19, 18 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: OUTsurance (Ireland) (August 3)

[edit source ]
Latest comment: 10 days ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Ethmostigmus, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage : discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable : from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent : not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Does not appear to be independently notable from OUTsurance Group, though you are welcome to add more information about this subsidiary to the main OUTsurance article.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:OUTsurance (Ireland) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 07:06, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

August 2026

[edit source ]
Latest comment: 19 hours ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
icon

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
MCE89 (talk) 06:25, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

Administrators: If this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue. Admins lifting or loosening such blocks without appropriate authorization may, at the discretion of the Arbitration Committee, be desysopped.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /