User talk:Demia Silagadze1
Hi Demia Silagadze1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Svampesky (talk) 18:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC) Reply
Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Ganja (1796). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:31, 7 December 2024 (UTC) Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Ganja (1796) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 12:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC) Reply
Thanks for your contributions to Capture of Metekhi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris talk! 09:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC) Reply
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo bons mots 20:41, 14 February 2025 (UTC) Reply - I'm very concerned about your creation of unsourced and poorly sub-stub articles. You are abandoning drafts and recreating the content in article space, despite consensus against at least on of the creations. If you can create acceptable drafts, I will remove the block.-- Ponyo bons mots 20:41, 14 February 2025 (UTC) Reply
Demia Silagadze1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI )
Request reason:
I understand that you can't create articles without sources, but I was new at the time and didn't know how to add sources. I won't do that again, so please unblock me.
Decline reason:
You are only blocked from article space, and you don't describe why you need access to it restored(i.e. what edits you intend to make). A lack of sources is a serious issue, so we can't just take your word, you will need to show us that you can edit properly; you may do this by submitting edit requests(click for instructions) or using the Article Wizard to create and submit a draft. Once you have some success at these things, we can reevaluate returning your access to article space. 331dot (talk) 09:43, 6 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock }} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock
[edit ]Hello 331dot,
Thank you for your response. I understand the importance of proper sourcing and the concerns regarding my editing. I am willing to demonstrate that I can edit properly by submitting edit requests and working with the Article Wizard.
Could you please clarify how many successful edit requests or drafts would be considered sufficient for reevaluating my access to article space? I am eager to contribute constructively and in line with Wikipedia’s policies.
Best regards, Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 15:26, 6 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
Demia Silagadze1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI )
Request reason:
Thank you for your response. I understand the importance of proper sourcing and the concerns regarding my editing. I am willing to demonstrate that I can edit properly by submitting edit requests and working with the Article Wizard. Could you please clarify how many successful edit requests or drafts would be considered sufficient for reevaluating my access to article space? I am eager to contribute constructively and in line with Wikipedia’s policies. Best regards, [Demia Silagadze1]
Decline reason:
You forgot to point to your set of successful edit requests. Indeed, this doesn't seem to be an unblock request at all, despite using the unblock template. Please don't abuse the unblock template in this manner. To answer your question, though, a "meaningfully significant number" would be my answer. One or two isn't going to cut it, but we certainly don't need 500. Yamla (talk) 16:16, 6 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock }} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Demia Silagadze1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI )
Request reason:
Hello Yamla,
I realize I made a mistake and I want to sincerely apologize. It was never my intention to upset you or cause any harm. I deeply regret if I did anything that hurt or upset you, and I truly hope we can move past this.
I understand if you need time, but I hope you can give me a chance to make things right. If you’re ready, would you consider unblocking me so we can talk things through? I don’t want this to be the way things end.
Thank you, and once again, I apologize. Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 18:40, 7 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
Decline reason:
I suggest you propose some edits on talk pages to show the block is no longer needed. PhilKnight (talk) 17:15, 8 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock }} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- You can talk to us right now, you are only blocked from editing articles. You made another unblock request that just seems to be a communication with us- not every comment needs to be an unblock request. Whatever you have to say about this, now is the time- go ahead. 331dot (talk) 13:33, 8 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
Demia Silagadze1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI )
Request reason:
Thank you for your suggestion. I understand the concern and will work on proposing edits on talk pages. Could you clarify if there are any specific areas where you would like to see improvements before reconsidering the block?
Decline reason:
This isn't an unblock request, so you don't need the request formatting. You may propose edits to any article that interests you. If you need help finding articles to edit, try the Community Portal. Instructions for edit requests may be found at WP:ER; There is also the edit request wizard that can facilitate the process. 331dot (talk) 13:03, 9 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock }} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Dear 331dot,
I kindly request a review of my block, which was placed due to the creation of articles without sufficient sources. I fully acknowledge my mistake and am committed to adhering to the platform’s guidelines by properly citing reliable sources in the future.
I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to correct my contributions and create high-quality content in compliance with the rules. Please consider my request for an unblock.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Best regards,
Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 16:16, 16 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- You are addressing me personally, but an unblock request is to ask for a third party to review the block. As such, I have removed the request formatting. My opinion of this remains unchanged; if you want to regain access to article space, you will need to specifically demonstrate that you understand why you were blocked and tell what steps you will take to remedy those issues. Please see the unblock appeals guide. 331dot (talk) 19:56, 16 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- I writed a block request, please read it🙏 Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 05:19, 19 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
Demia Silagadze1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI )
Request reason:
Dear Administrator,
I am writing to appeal my recent block from editing Wikipedia. I understand that this action was taken due to Using unreliable sources and creating an edit war without a source. 
I acknowledge that my actions violated Wikipedia’s guidelines, and I sincerely apologize for any disruption caused. I have reviewed the relevant policies and am committed to adhering to them in the future. 
I respectfully request that you reconsider my block, as I am eager to contribute positively and constructively to the Wikipedia community.
Thank you for considering my appeal.
Best regards,
Decline reason:
Please only open one unblock request at a time. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:03, 27 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock }} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi there! In your unblock request, you have addressed some of the behaviours that resulted in your block (e.g., using unreliable sources and edit warring). Can you tell us what you will do differently if you are unblocked? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:42, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
Dear Administrator,@Significa liberdade
Thank you for your response and for giving me the opportunity to clarify my commitment to improving my contributions.
If I am unblocked, I will strictly adhere to Wikipedia’s guidelines by ensuring that all my edits are backed by reliable and verifiable sources. I will carefully review the reliability of sources before making any changes and will consult the relevant policies to avoid any issues.
Additionally, I will avoid edit warring by engaging in constructive discussions on talk pages whenever disagreements arise. I understand the importance of collaboration within the Wikipedia community, and I will prioritize consensus-building and respectful communication with other editors.
I truly appreciate Wikipedia’s mission and would love to contribute positively and responsibly. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Best regards, Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 05:59, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- This response appears to be AI-generated. Because we are interested in knowing that you will not cause further disruption to Wikipedia, we want to hear from you, not ChatGPT. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:02, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
Hello @Significa liberdade
Now I will start creating articles with sources, but in recent days I have been using sources to create a Wikipedia page. I have created one page "George's campaign against the Timurids" which you can see. Thank you for your attention. Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 06:10, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- Can you tell me about your contributions to George's campaign against the Timurids? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:16, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- The campaigns of George VII against the Timurids (1405–1406) were two attacks by the Kingdom of Georgia in the Caucasus. After the death of Timurid, George VII was able to regain the lost territories and with a small army (about 5,000 fighters) defeated the numerous Timurid army. His forces invaded Nakhchivan, Ganja, Anis and other cities, but the story does not end there, the Iranian ruler Umar with an army of 15,000 landed in Atalghi. George attacked the enemy at night and drove them back to Tabriz. Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 06:27, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- In 1403, Timur finally left the Caucasus and headed for Central Asia, where he died on February 19, 1405, while preparing for a massive invasion of China. And the subsequent power struggles among his heirs, Timur's empire became fragmented as Miran Shah and his sons struggled over control of Persia. In the midst of this chaos, George VII, who had returned from Imereti, engaged in battles to regain lost territories. He conquered Nakhchivan and Ganja while also causing destruction in places like Ani, Erzurum, and Tabriz. Despite commanding an army of merely 5,000 men, George succeeded in expanding Georgia's borders temporarily to their former extent.
- In 1406, The ruler of Iran gathered an army and camped in Alatagh, Caucasus. George suddenly attacked and drove the enemy towards Tabriz. Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 06:29, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- @Significa liberdade where are you? Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 06:41, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- This looks like the current article. What contributions did you make? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:49, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- @Significa liberdade no I didn't because I'm blocked and how? (you can search George's campaign against the Timurids) Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 06:54, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- OK, let's go back to my original question: Can you tell us what you will do differently if you are unblocked? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:55, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- @Significa liberdade I will add sources to the articles as soon as I make a change and provide you with useful information. Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 07:08, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- Thank you. I also see you're blocked for recreating deleted articles. Can you address this concern? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:11, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- Yes, I am ready. Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 07:17, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- What will you do in the future? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:20, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- In the future, we will make changes to the articles by including sources, providing you with useful information. Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 07:23, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- What will you do if an article you created has been deleted? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:25, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- I will re-create the article with sources. Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 07:28, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- Or the sources can't be found on the internet, I'll give up. Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 07:29, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- @Significa liberdade hey where are you Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 07:43, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- We are not all here 24 hours a day. Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 08:08, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- Given the quality of this conversation, I'm uncomfortable unblocking you at this time. However, if someone else is satisfied, I would not object. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:05, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- why I want just unblock, not anything else Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 10:42, 22 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- What will you do if an article you created has been deleted? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:25, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- In the future, we will make changes to the articles by including sources, providing you with useful information. Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 07:23, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- What will you do in the future? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:20, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- Yes, I am ready. Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 07:17, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- Thank you. I also see you're blocked for recreating deleted articles. Can you address this concern? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:11, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- @Significa liberdade I will add sources to the articles as soon as I make a change and provide you with useful information. Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 07:08, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- OK, let's go back to my original question: Can you tell us what you will do differently if you are unblocked? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:55, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- @Significa liberdade no I didn't because I'm blocked and how? (you can search George's campaign against the Timurids) Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 06:54, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
- This looks like the current article. What contributions did you make? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:49, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
Demia Silagadze1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI )
Request reason:
Dear Administrator,
I am writing to appeal my recent block from editing Wikipedia. I understand that this action was taken due to Using unreliable sources and creating an edit war without a source. 
I acknowledge that my actions violated Wikipedia’s guidelines, and I sincerely apologize for any disruption caused. I have reviewed the relevant policies and am committed to adhering to them in the future. 
I respectfully request that you reconsider my block, as I am eager to contribute positively and constructively to the Wikipedia community.
Thank you for considering my appeal.
Best regards, Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 16:22, 26 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
Decline reason:
Please only open one unblock request at a time. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:04, 27 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock }} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thanks for your contributions to George's campaign against the Timurids. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. asilvering (talk) 00:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC) Reply
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Demia Silagadze1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI )
Request reason:
Dear administrators, I know what I am blocked for (sockpuppet) but please recover my page, I have book sources in that page and this is not enough?
Decline reason:
No way. You created 10 accounts. You are banned. You do not get to create articles while banned. PhilKnight (talk) 16:35, 19 April 2025 (UTC) Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock }} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Demia Silagadze1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI )
Request reason:
Dear administrators, I heard your answer, but I made those 10 accounts because I was banned from the account and you wouldn't unblock me, that's why I decided to make accounts. If you unban me now, I'll refrain from doing the same thing in the future. Thanks in advance.
Decline reason:
That demonstrates you haven't the slightest intention of following Wikipedia's policies. Yamla (talk) 14:48, 8 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock }} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Demia Silagadze1 (talk) 09:28, 22 April 2025 (UTC) Reply
- That you did that is why you're blocked. When you are blocked from using Wikipedia, it's not just your account that's blocked, but you the person. The original block was for adding poor sources, but now that you've evaded your block repeatedly, it's going to be far more difficult to get unblocked now. Your best bet of ever getting unblocked is almost certainly taking WP:OFFER, meaning being completely removed from Wikipedia for a minimum of six months with no further block evasion. Since you made 10 sockpuppet accounts (at least), you'll likely be considered a WP:3X block evader, meaning that you'll have to make an appeal to the community to have your editing rights restored. I wish you good fortune on being able to return to editing in the future, be it one year, five years, or 10 years down the road. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC) Reply
Information icon Hello, Demia Silagadze1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Ganja, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:08, 7 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George's campaign against the Timurids until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Information icon Hello, Demia Silagadze1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Capture of Metekhi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 21 September 2025 (UTC) Reply
Hello, Demia Silagadze1. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Capture of Metekhi".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 07:26, 13 October 2025 (UTC) Reply