Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

User talk:Cpeedexpert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by DreamRimmer bot II in topic Your draft article, Draft:MYCPE ONE

Welcome, Cpeedexpert!

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 year ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
A plate of chocolate chip cookies on a blue and white striped plate. The plate sits on a beige surface.
Have a plate of cookies!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Cpeedexpert! I'm Bleeng, and I've been assigned as your mentor. All new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! Bleeng (talk) 20:21, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shalin (Shawn) Parikh (May 20)

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 year ago 2 comments1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Fancy Refrigerator were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 12:37, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Cpeedexpert! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk . If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse , a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 12:37, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Reply

May 2025

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 year ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
Information icon

Hello Cpeedexpert. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Cpeedexpert. The template {{Paid }} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Cpeedexpert|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 12:37, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Shalin (Shawn) Parikh has a new comment

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 year ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shalin (Shawn) Parikh. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:10, 27 May 2025 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shalin (Shawn) Parikh (June 3)

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 year ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:50, 3 June 2025 (UTC) Reply

June 2025

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 year ago 4 comments2 people in discussion
Information icon

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Cpeedexpert, and the template {{Paid }} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Cpeedexpert|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:01, 10 June 2025 (UTC) Reply

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:04, 10 June 2025 (UTC) Reply

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 12:14, 10 June 2025 (UTC) Reply

Please know that it is not adequate to say that you have a conflict of interest. Paid editing is a very specific kind of conflict of interest and you are required to make a disclosure in accordance to the paid contribution policy. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 12:17, 10 June 2025 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: MYCPE ONE (June 10)

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 year ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MCE89 (talk) 12:33, 10 June 2025 (UTC) Reply

June 2025

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 year ago 2 comments1 person in discussion

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
331dot (talk) 10:00, 11 June 2025 (UTC) Reply

Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue.

You have not responded to the inquiries on this page. As noted, it's not enough for you to say you have a conflict of interest if you work for the company or its founder- the Terms of Use require you to disclose as a paid editor. The salary you draw(if an employee) is sufficient to trigger this requirement, you do not need to be specifically paid to edit. The block can be removed if you agree to disclose as a paid editor. 331dot (talk) 10:03, 11 June 2025 (UTC) Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Shalin (Shawn) Parikh

[edit ]
Latest comment: 9 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Information icon Hello, Cpeedexpert. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shalin (Shawn) Parikh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:08, 3 November 2025 (UTC) Reply

Concern regarding Draft:MYCPE ONE

[edit ]
Latest comment: 9 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Information icon Hello, Cpeedexpert. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MYCPE ONE, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:13, 12 November 2025 (UTC) Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Shalin (Shawn) Parikh

[edit ]
Latest comment: 8 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Cpeedexpert. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Shalin (Shawn) Parikh".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:26, 3 December 2025 (UTC) Reply

Your draft article, Draft:MYCPE ONE

[edit ]
Latest comment: 8 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Cpeedexpert. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "MYCPE ONE".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:25, 10 December 2025 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /