User talk:Chess enjoyer
- Add new text under old text.
- New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
- Assume good faith
- Be polite and avoid personal attacks
- Be welcoming to newcomers
- Seek dispute resolution if needed
Unless they have reverted it, which they haven't, there is no reason to remove the CSD. – LuniZunie (talk) 19:05, 11 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
- The CSD actually also helps bring admin attention, the only reason to wait until the block is if you know they are going to edit war. – LuniZunie (talk) 19:07, 11 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
- @LuniZunie, I just thought it was too soon. You and I both knew we were looking at a duck quacking into a megaphone, but that G5 couldn't be actioned until they were actually blocked as one. I hadn't thought about it bringing admin attention, though. Chess enjoyer (talk) 19:40, 11 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
- It can actually be actioned before they are blocked, the being blocked is based on the master account; which is blocked. – LuniZunie (talk) 19:42, 11 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
- @LuniZunie, I just thought it was too soon. You and I both knew we were looking at a duck quacking into a megaphone, but that G5 couldn't be actioned until they were actually blocked as one. I hadn't thought about it bringing admin attention, though. Chess enjoyer (talk) 19:40, 11 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
I chose mine, but yes, thanks! Valereee (talk) 23:18, 15 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
- You're welcome, and don't feel bad about it: I've made the same mistake myself a couple of times :) Chess enjoyer (talk) 23:31, 15 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
EatingCarBatteries (contribs | talk) 21:04, 18 May 2026 (UTC) ReplyHello Chessenjoyer, I am attempting to create a wikiproject on Chess Streamers. I have got 3-5 people and need others. Would you consider joining ? We could use your experience. &RezAlt! (talk) 02:44, 23 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Hi &RezAlt!. Thanks for offering, but I'm not particularly interested in editing in that topic area. If you haven't already, you might want to give this page a read. Chess enjoyer (talk) 03:48, 23 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Thank you anyways ! &RezAlt! (talk) 14:30, 23 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Thanks to both of you :)
- I've been wondering how accurate that descriptor is, though. I first added it to my user page a while ago . Chess enjoyer (talk) 02:35, 27 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
- thx! oh, and sign me guestbook too! alexa will be waitin’ for u there. AltoHampton t • c • g • s 02:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Done. Chess enjoyer (talk) 02:42, 27 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
- thx! oh, and sign me guestbook too! alexa will be waitin’ for u there. AltoHampton t • c • g • s 02:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
regardin’ , i dont mind alexa there. in fact, she might be cheerin’ u up there, so there’s no need to remove her! AltoHampton t • c • g • s 03:05, 27 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
- oh, and appreciate her in me sandbox if u want! she’ll be happy! AltoHampton t • c • g • s 03:10, 27 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Gotcha. By the way, I don't believe I've given my preferred pronouns anywhere? They/them is a good default when you don't know. Chess enjoyer (talk) 03:12, 27 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
- @Chess enjoyer sure thing. AltoHampton t • c • g • s 03:20, 27 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
back a couple hours ago i did a edit on your wikipedia about Kim Ju Ae and i was adding one of Kim Ju Ae’s latest appearances not putting in deceased people in it or anything just writing about that in march this year she was for sure driving a tank with kim jong un and top officials on top of it and just check the internet and news articles you may find this sorce of information Isaiahs role plays (talk) 06:08, 5 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Hi. Was this edit you logged out? I was able to find a source that covered most of the content and cite it in the article, but you should really be citing sources yourself instead of expecting others to do it for you. Otherwise, editors are likely to remove it as unsourced, like I did initially. Chess enjoyer (talk) 06:41, 5 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
Hi Chess enjoyer. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
- Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback §When to use rollback.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
- Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!
I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin) and Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! ASUKITE 16:05, 6 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
Does it seem a little WP:POINTy to you that Katzrockso deliberately reinstated unsourced information to justify their "keep" !vote in the RFD? Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • (What did I screw up now?) 18:25, 8 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Well, that guideline is about making edits you don't actually agree with to make a point, and I assume that Katzrockso genuinely thinks the information should be there. I don't think WP:POINT applies. That being said:
- @Katzrockso , I would prefer that you add sources when you reinstate challenged material, not later, per WP:BURDEN.
- @TenPoundHammer , I don't think this was a valid use of Rollback. It wasn't obvious vandalism, and none of the other uses of Rollback seem to apply. Per point one, I think the edit was otherwise okay, it just needed an edit summary.
- Chess enjoyer (talk) 18:52, 8 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- I was at work at the time, which is why I was unable to go search through the references I had previously uncovered when researching for the AfD nomination. No WP:BURDEN challenge was stated, the material was initially removed for mentioning a "non notable org", which is an invalid reason for removal. WP:ARTN and WP:NNC make it clear that non-notable topics can certainly (and very often are) included within other articles, but they just don't warrant a standalone article. Katzrockso (talk) 20:27, 8 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Notability aside, I don't think any content that has a {{cn }} tag should be restored without a reference to a reliable source, regardless of whether the edit summary had an explicit burden challenge. However, I knew all of that would become moot once you added those sources, and that's why I didn't revert you myself. Chess enjoyer (talk) 20:51, 8 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- @Katzrockso: my apologies for assuming bad faith. I still think the history of the article (again: A7'd, restored, AFD'd, deleted, upheld at DRV, then re-created by me anyway to mitigate off-site harassment) is enough that the redirect should not stand, per both WP:UNDUE (other game show personnel were also at Game Show Congress; why this one in particular?) and WP:NOPAGE (given the contentious history of the page). Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • (What did I screw up now?) 13:05, 9 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- WP:REDIRECTPURPOSE states
Subtopics or other topics that are described or listed within a wider article. (Such redirects are often targeted to a particular section of the article.)
. A7, AfD deletion and a DRV are not under the list of reasons to delete a redirect. - But this is not RfD, so I'm not sure why we are discussing the merits of the redirect. Katzrockso (talk) 23:37, 9 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- WP:REDIRECTPURPOSE states
- @Katzrockso: my apologies for assuming bad faith. I still think the history of the article (again: A7'd, restored, AFD'd, deleted, upheld at DRV, then re-created by me anyway to mitigate off-site harassment) is enough that the redirect should not stand, per both WP:UNDUE (other game show personnel were also at Game Show Congress; why this one in particular?) and WP:NOPAGE (given the contentious history of the page). Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • (What did I screw up now?) 13:05, 9 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Notability aside, I don't think any content that has a {{cn }} tag should be restored without a reference to a reliable source, regardless of whether the edit summary had an explicit burden challenge. However, I knew all of that would become moot once you added those sources, and that's why I didn't revert you myself. Chess enjoyer (talk) 20:51, 8 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- I was at work at the time, which is why I was unable to go search through the references I had previously uncovered when researching for the AfD nomination. No WP:BURDEN challenge was stated, the material was initially removed for mentioning a "non notable org", which is an invalid reason for removal. WP:ARTN and WP:NNC make it clear that non-notable topics can certainly (and very often are) included within other articles, but they just don't warrant a standalone article. Katzrockso (talk) 20:27, 8 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
Hello Chess enjoyer, a request you commented on at WP:ARCA regarding the transgender healthcare and people case has been closed and archived at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Archive 136#Clarification request: Transgender healthcare and people. Regards, ~delta {talk • cont • 🇰🇷 • 🎢} 21:08, 24 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
did u notice that the alexa sprite has slightly changed? i'm just makin' sure... (she's on ur userpage anyway...) A H R (g • s • c) 06:12, 25 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Is that a new pair of shoes I see? Definitely didn't check the page history on Commons. Nope. Chess enjoyer (talk) 06:15, 25 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
.svg){kind=link}
Issac I Navarro (talk) wishes you peace!
I hope that when you see this message, it is uplifting! I sincerely appreciate that you responded to the ping on the RfC Talk:Clop (erotic fan art). I know that page can be a lot, and I wanted to show my gratitude for your edits. (also noted it is not Cheese ) Issac I Navarro (talk) 02:00, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Thanks, and you're welcome :)
- Yeah, I didn't know if I wanted to join the heated debate going on over there, but I thought I should comment on something that involved me directly. Chess enjoyer (talk) 02:29, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Sorry if you did not want a ping for that thread, though.
- I did find your rationale to be compelling regarding the non-explicit image. and wanted to point out why I had that stance. :) Issac I Navarro (talk) 02:33, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- No need to apologize, I don't mind being pinged. Chess enjoyer (talk) 02:40, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- It is just that I understand, given the nature of the article (as it involves a children’s cartoon being turned into pornographic content), that some may not wish to engage with it. Also, as you mentioned with how it was getting heated, I felt that some WP:♥ to the involved editors was in order. Issac I Navarro (talk) 02:48, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- I hope this message was uplifting. Once again, thank you for your continued years of service and contributions on Wikipedia as a whole. Issac I Navarro (talk) 02:50, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- No need to apologize, I don't mind being pinged. Chess enjoyer (talk) 02:40, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
Hi Chess enjoyer. Thank you for your work on Echinosocius elatensis. Another editor, PeriodicEditor, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
First 2 sources support the claim, but at least from the abstract, the 3rd one does not mention it, although it may in the actual article.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|PeriodicEditor}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Curious Astra, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. In solidarity, KuyaMoHirowo (talk • contribs) 04:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Twinkle's funny sometimes, isn't it? Thanks for tagging the redirect :) Chess enjoyer (talk) 04:46, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
- I was tagged for speedy deletion, but I was a LTA. In solidarity, KuyaMoHirowo (talk • contribs) 05:44, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Reply