User talk:CallahanKieranKiki420
Hi CallahanKieranKiki420! I noticed your contributions to Thomas the Tank Engine and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 02:30, 2 January 2026 (UTC) Reply
Information icon Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Warner Bros. Pictures Animation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 19:49, 15 January 2026 (UTC) Reply
Information icon Hi CallahanKieranKiki420! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of Walt Disney Studios (division). The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:Walt Disney Studios (division), please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. ~ rusty meow ~ 01:34, 27 January 2026 (UTC) Reply
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 15:05, 27 January 2026 (UTC) Reply Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pixar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Contributor19 (talk) 01:53, 28 January 2026 (UTC) Reply
Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rio (film series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. There has been a section of the Talk page open for months about the "without Blue Sky's involvement" claim. Please enter discussion and find consensus before readding this unsourced claim. Nat Gertler (talk) 00:24, 15 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
Information icon Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Blue Sky Studios, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Category:American animation studios is unnecessary as the article is already in the more specific category of Category:Defunct American animation studios. Belbury (talk) 13:47, 19 April 2026 (UTC) Reply
Information icon Before adding a category to an article, as you did to The Secret of NIMH, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:26, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
Stop icon You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Rio (franchise). This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.
Important points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Nat Gertler (talk) 20:30, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
Stop icon You appear to be engaged in an edit war at Rio (franchise). An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly revert each other's changes. Please do not revert or undo the edits made by other editors when your changes are reverted. Instead, use the talk page to discuss how the page can represent consensus among the editors involved. Here is some advice on how to do this. If discussions get stuck, you can request a third opinion, ask for help at a relevant noticeboard, or seek dispute resolution.
Edit warring can result in being blocked from editing , especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts within 24 hours on one page. Undoing any other editor's work, in whole or in part, involving the same or different material, is a revert. You can still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not violate the three-revert rule should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nat Gertler (talk) 20:37, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- I don't want people to think Rio 3 will never happen CallahanKieranKiki420 (talk) 20:39, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rio (franchise), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can Rio_(franchise)&preloadparams%5b%5d=1357637919"}]]}">report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:54, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Reply