Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

User talk:BiodiversityEditor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit source ]
Latest comment: 3 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi BiodiversityEditor! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! Pasados (talk) 06:23, 1 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Krishi Avam Paristhitiki Vikas Sansthan (May 9)

[edit source ]
Latest comment: 2 months ago 2 comments1 person in discussion
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
This draft appears to contain copyrighted materialfrom https://www.elinorostromaward.org/2025-awardees, which has been removed. Wikipedia strictly prohibits copyright violations. Assume all text is copyrighted unless released under a compatible license. Users who continue to post copyrighted material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Scam warning

SomeoneDreaming (talk) 20:38, 9 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, BiodiversityEditor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk . If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse , a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SomeoneDreaming (talk) 20:38, 9 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Krishi Avam Paristhitiki Vikas Sansthan has a new comment

[edit source ]
Latest comment: 2 months ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Krishi Avam Paristhitiki Vikas Sansthan. Thanks! SomeoneDreaming (talk) 20:44, 9 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit source ]
Latest comment: 1 hour ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Information icon Hello, BiodiversityEditor. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation for any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

See the FAQ for article subjects for more information.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:49, 4 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Krishi Avam Paristhitiki Vikas Sansthan (August 4)

[edit source ]
Latest comment: 1 hour ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, DoubleGrazing, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage : discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable : from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent : not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.

Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.
Primary sources do not establish notability per WP:ORG. We need to see what multiple secondary sources have said about this outfit. The draft reads like a corporate presentation, not an encyclopaedia article.

Next steps

Need help?

Scam warning

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:50, 4 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /