User talk:Ash/2007
Don't worry, I had reverted an edit where someone claimed that AOL made zero income. It was just coincidence that you had edited the page at the same time. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 19:03, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
WP:LGBT Coordinator Election Notice
This is just a quick, automated note to let you know that there is an election being conducted over the next 7 days for the position of "Coordinator" for the LGBT WikiProject. Your participation is requested. -- SatyrTN (talk · contribs) |}
HELP!
Please visit the NAMBLA article talk page Talk:North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association#categories_again and voice your disgust at NAMBLA being included as an LGBT organisation. Alternatively, if you believe that this is indeed an LGBT organisation, then you're welcome to voice that opinion. Either way, discussion is needed!Enzedbrit 21:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
LGBT WikiProject newsletter
| The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter |
|---|
|
Monthly Challenge: Find 5 editors to LGBT articles and invite them to the project! Check out our recruitment tips if you need them. Good luck!
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please drop me a line. |
Barrowman
Despite the risque title, my link was an actual article, and not vandalism. I think it's better than the previous article, as it gives more context to what actually happened. --Silvestris 21:10, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Apologies for removing it, I made assumptions based on the title. -- Ash 10:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Joxquiz
The article Joxquiz has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 16:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
It's a reference to a word someone made up when discussing Scrabble. The fact that it was mentioned once in a journal article doesn't establish that the word itself is notable or in general use. Even if it was, it would be better for Wiktionary than here. NawlinWiki 16:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've taken your advice and moved it to Wiktionary. Ash 16:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
LGBT WikiProject newsletter
| The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter |
|---|
|
Monthly Challenge:
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please drop me a line. |
SatyrBot 04:57, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
LGBT WikiProject newsletter
| The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter - SPECIAL ELECTION EDITION |
|---|
|
Monthly Challenge: Stand for Deputy Coordinator or support some candidates after May 5...
|
This month's project newsletter (hand delivered as SatyrTN and Dev920 are away). Best wishes, WjB scribe 03:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
| The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter |
|---|
|
Monthly Challenge: June Stub Review! Take a moment and sift through the roughly 3,600 Stub-class LGBT articles. Are they still stubs? If not, make an assessment change. Even better, do you see anything you can add/edit to increase the rating? Let's see if the project can lower the number of stubs down below 3,000!
|
Delivered on 16:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 15:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
"Vandalism warning"
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
- Please note, if you want to give someone a vandalism warning, you need to quote the page you think they have vandalized and you need to sign it, as I did on your talk page User:91.125.38.104 when I put up a polite first level warning. How sad that you feel the need to be petty by putting this last warning on my talk page. -- Ash 17:46, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 91.125.120.95 17:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- That's more like it! -- Ash 21:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
| The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter |
|---|
|
Monthly Challenge: Submit an article to our Jumpaclass competition! Languishing unloved, it is a great way to improving that article you always meant to improve but never got round to. Challenge someone else to go head to head and see who can improve their article most!
|
Delivered on 16:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC).
Carn Brea and Harry potter car
Unfortunately, user:Tony Sidaway has removed the article about the car again!
I have requested that we set up some kind of vote to keep or retain, but he has refused this, as he said that it is trivia, and has no place on the Carn Brea article.
I strongly disagree with this, as I feel that is very relevant, and not mere trivia. However, I do not know how to set up a vote to keep or retain myself.
Tinminer 13:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Quote from Tony Sidaway's talk pages:
13 Carn Brea
Harry Potter car & the South West Film Studios.
The fact that Harry Potter's car (or, more correctly, the Ford Anglia used in the film 'Harry Potter & The Chamber of Secrets') is a relevant fact about the hill, as the hill has long had so called properties about turning up missing artefacts throughout history. The car was stolen from the film studios, which are visible from the hill itself.
The car later turned up on the hill a week later.
Clearly it was some kind of prank, but due to the enormous global popularity of the Harry Potter films and books, this fact is of importance and not trivia.
You may not like Harry Potter, but you cannot deny its popularity.
Suggest we put this to the vote.
Tinminer 10:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
We don't decide matters like this on Wikipedia with votes. The fact is relevant to the car (I believe it already has an article) but of supreme irrelevance to the location. The car had to be dumped somewhere. --Tony Sidaway 10:20, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Hammam
Please keep an eye on Hammam. After a rather inept attempt to un-merge Turkish bath, user:Vtbproject (who I assume is Malcolm Shifrin) is now trying to delete a section from Hammam with the ridiculous claim that it is his copyright. -- RHaworth 14:12, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Carn Brea
Hi, I was fascinated to read of your childhood exploration of the Carn - would you or any of your family have photos of the tunels? Would make an excellent additon to Commons. DuncanHill 12:10, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Afraid not. The next time I'm down (prob. October) I'll try and hunt down the entrance to Smugglers' Cave again and take a photo of it. I'll also experiment with my GPS and make a note of detailed coordinates. Most tourists would never find it as it is in a dip away from the bridle path and tricky to find buried in the gorse. Ash 21:46, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- OK, cool DuncanHill 22:09, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Image:Incognito_sauna.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Incognito_sauna.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 23:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- After even getting permission from the editor of the magazine, it's just to complex to make everyone happy. I give up! Ash 21:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
| The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter |
|---|
|
Message from Coordinator: It's been almost two months since the last newsletter came out, so there are a fair few people who haven't really been kept up with our project. I'd like to welcome all those who have joined and those who have returned, and strongly reccommend that you use the talkpage for any queries or problems you have. Happy editing!
|
Delivered on 16:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC).
Image source problem with Image:AOL Broadband logo.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot . You have recently uploaded Image:AOL Broadband logo.jpg . The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self }} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- God, it's getting hard to put any sort of image on Wikipedia these days.Ash 21:13, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
| The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter |
|---|
|
The LGBT studies project has been rather quiet of late. Though we've added over 180 new members in the last year, only a small percentage are active participants. If you haven't visited our project or talk page in a while, please stop by for a look. Also, if you happen to bump into another editor who you feel might enjoy working with us, please extend an invitation. There's lot's do do, and the active members would sincerely appreciate some help. Welcome to the 11 new members that joined us in September: Bu852, JuniorMuruin, Laualoha, JereKrischel, Dybryd, Sexperts, Ctjf83, Allstarecho, Johnandbob, Carlossuarez46, and Carterdriggs! Our Peer review project is struggling at the present, with only a few people reviewing the articles. While it is certainly possible to submit articles for a general peer review, a review by members of the LGBT community can be of additional value for LGBT specific writing. There are several articles currently up for review on a wide range of topics. At the very least, reading the articles will undoubtedly broaden your intellectual horizons :-) At the moment, David Le Brocq, Malmö Devilants and Trajectory Hermeneutics are up for deletion review. Please take a look at them and make your voice heard at the deletion review. Articles nominated for deletion also present a challenge for improvement. See what you can do, and watchlist our deletion review page.
Since our last newsletter, Fun Home and GayFest have been promoted to Good Article status. Congratulations to all editors who have worked so hard to improve them! While the T-Z list was promoted to Featured list on September 26, 2007, we have had no articles reach Featured Article status since Homer's Phobia was promoted last March. In fact, one article of our Project was delisted: Andrew Van De Kamp. Please take a look at out listed articles and see if you'd like to try to take one to Featured status (there are almost 8,000 to choose from). Additionally, Conversion therapy has been nominated for Featured status. Please read the article and give feedback at the Feartured Article Candidates page. (See also our FA-class list.)
The Pederasty articles continue to be a point of controversy both within and outside of our community. Various editors have suggested that to include them as LGBT Project related somehow taints the project and brings Wikipedia into disrepute. Other editors have stated that the articles, and especially the Pederasty article, are part of the core of LGBT studies. Well meaning editors continue to remove our tags from the articles themselves as well as the talk pages. If you have time, please read the articles and watchlist them to protect them from vandalism and well meaning but counterproductive edits. The list of LGBT people has survived its 4th nomination for deletion. Please watchlist this list to protect it from vandalism and unsourced additions. There are many in Wikipedia who would like to see this Featured status list removed from the project. It is up to us to keep it to such a high caliber that it never is removed. Our project member David Shankbone is now working as a journalist for Wikinews, as well as continuing to improve our project and Wikipedia as a whole with his photographs. A sincere thank you goes out to him for all of his hard work. Wikipedia would not shine nearly as brightly without your contributions, David. The surviving life partner of prominent LGBT rights activist Barbara Gittings recently called one of our editors and, among other things, complimented us on what a great job our project is doing on Wikipedia. Thanks to everyone who contributes to this project, either through their article edits or support for other project members. We really are making an difference here!
Some of our project members have been having difficulties related to editing on the encyclopedia. If you are feeling frustrated or distressed by your editing experience, please don't keep it to yourself. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, and we are all here to help one another. Drop a line on our talkpage or on another editor's page, and other members of the LGBT project will happily give you the support you want and need. Lastly, Halloween is just around the corner. More than most holidays, Halloween is a holiday embraced by and tailor made to our community (though God only knows why we are invisible in the Halloween article here. Perhaps somebody would like to rectify that editing oversight). Have fun, everybody, and remember to both trick and treat! |
Delivered on 17:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC).
LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
| The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |
|---|---|
|
Hey, Peeps, it's that time of the month again (no not that time — get your mind out of the gutter): time for another monthly edition of the LGBT Project's Love Boat newsletter from your cruise director Miss Julie. So much has been happening this month and I just can't wait to tell you all about it!!! Alice and her harasserLet's start with some good news: Alice and the project lost the bothersome sock puppet who had been disrupting many articles we monitor, and now most of us can edit in relative peace. Congratulations, Alice, for being able to come out of semi-retirement. Benjiboi, on the other hand, has gained an anonymous IP stalker who seems to be more Catholic than the Pope and who has a hard-on for the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence. We seem to have a sort of Yin and Yang thing going on here, which helps both to keep us in balance and on our toes <bright smiles all around>. Harry Potter and his homosexual teacherAlbus Dumbledore got outed this month, and was immediately adopted by our project. The international brouhaha surrounding this disclosure reached all the way to Wikiland, and his article was briefly locked due to homophobic vandalism (as well as well meaning editors who just couldn't believe that that nice man could possibly be gay). This is a wonderful article to add to your watchlist, and will surely give you hours of reverting fun on cold winter days. "My Fellow Americans"On a more serious note, Fireplace has suggested a new article series about LGBT rights in the United States, state by state. This ambitious topic will surely require many editors and a lot of research, but has the potential to add further prestige to our already prestigious project. Same name, same sexuality: a riddle for the agesFrancis Bacon (not the new gay one, but the old gay one ... though they're actually both dead, now that I think about it) has also aroused passions here on Wikipedia, with editors opposing his sexuality being disclosed in his biography. The always helpful Haiduc has thoughtfully provided any number of sources, but it is slow going getting his point across. Anyone want to lend a hand? Beat writer arouses Irish guyAnd speaking of passions, Jack Kerouac has inflamed the senses once again with editors, including administrator Irishguy, mounting a spirited defense to keep him as heterosexual as possible for Wikipedia purposes. Why? I don't know. Perhaps some of you can drop by the talk page and ask your questions there. I feel certain a stimulating debate will ensue that will be enjoyed by all. Love those Texas LonghornsDid you know that one of our Featured articles, Lawrence v. Texas, lost its shiny gold star? That was a shocker. It has been suggested that we turn our attention to it in an effort to restore it to its former glory. I took a peek, and it does need our help badly. For our American editors, it would seem almost a civic duty to edit it (not that I'm hinting....). Point and CounterpointThough it was far too intellectual a debate for a mere cruise director like myself to take part in, Intersexuality was certainly a hot topic a week or two ago. The thrust of the debate was over inclusion in our project. Lots of good editors had lots of good opinions. For those too lazy to check out the discussion, we decided to leave it out for now. Drudgery on offerPeer review is, as always, short staffed and seemingly unloved. Wouldn't you feel better about yourself and the world in general if you took a few minutes to read one of the listed articles and offer some helpful advice? I know I'd feel better if you did. "My Fellow Americans" reduxThe article LGBT movements in the United States certainly raised eyebrows last week, especially when it was discovered that copyrighted content had been added to our article. Tragedy was averted at the last minute, though, when the original hosts of the article where the material had been pilfered agreed to make it free to everyone. Our thanks to them, whoever they are. Busy Bee that I am, I haven't had time to read it, but I'm sure it's sensational. This month's Wiki starsLesbian pulp fiction (a genre close to my heart, I must confess) writer Ann Bannon has decided to spice up the featured articles candidates list this month. Why not drop by and make your opinion heard? Joining her in this lofty aspiration are the articles But I'm a Cheerleader and Conversion therapy . I'm sure their main editors would welcome any comments (well, helpful ones, anyway) on the talk pages or the FAC discussions. And lest we forget, the List of gay, lesbian or bisexual people: Sd-Si became a Featured list!! Rah rah, siskumbah! Go, team, GO!!!! And the Oscar goes to...Not content to run for Best Actress, plucky Bannon won a Best supporting actress Oscar... whoops, I meant to say Ann is also getting more than her share of womanly attention on the Good Article list. Joining her on this exalted plane are Freddy Mercury, Waylon Smithers and Lance Bass. Good articles indeed, and the last one mentioned just goes to show that one needn't admire the subject of an article to appreciate the effort put into making him worthwhile reading. What on earth Britney ever saw in him I'll never know. Truly a riddle cloaked in an enigma and wrapped around a puzzle. Fresh faces to brighten our pagesThough I may not be the first, let me extend a warm, LGBT Love Boat welcome to the 12 new members who joined us in October: Jliberty, JockCub360, ChristopherEdwards, Desiderius82, Zlrussell, Kelsied, BeardedWoof, Mujerado, Tyrfing, Fabgurrl, Redl@nds597198, and decafdyke! Whatever you choose to do here, I feel sure that your contributions will enhance our project to no end. And if they don't...well, let's just say that I'm not shy. Leather and laceOn a personal note, your already overworked cruise director is being cyberly whipped almost daily by Nemissimo, who desperately wants to get the German BDSM translation copy edited and used as a replacement for the current one. It's such a ... err, stimulating topic that I am sure many of you will want to join the copy editing fun. Jump right in, folks! It's so lonely copy editing it all by my lonesome! Late breaking newsA little birdie just whispered in my ear that our noble collaboration project was delisted from the Community Portal due to inactivity. When asked how this scandalous turn of events could have occurred, the answer I received was "we suck at stuff like that". Well. In the first place, I disagree that sucking should be considered a negative, but to each his or her own. In the second place, I have full confidence that we can and will collaborate with other projects in the future. So let's not view this as a setback (even though it is), but rather a challenge to improve (and good Lord, I sound almost Wikipedian!). Champagne dreams and caviar kissesLastly, the holidays are rapidly approaching. Our American cousins are currently getting ready to slaughter masses of poultry in an effort to show their gratitude and generally peaceful demeanor, and those of the Canadian persuasion, trendsetters that they are, celebrated a bit early this year. I'm sure all us foreigners will join together in wishing them all a very happy Thanksgiving on their respective holidays, both already celebrated and forthcoming... though I would hope somebody would enlighten me as to why they don't celebrate it on the same day. I was awake all last night trying to figure that one out. In the spirit of this peculiarly North American holiday, let me take a moment to thank all of our editors for their contributions to this project. It's people like you who make people like me...well, a "people person"! May all your Wiki days be bright, and may your Love Boat never turn into a Poseidon. Kisses, | |
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please let us know here. | |
Delivered on 12:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC).
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Qx-international-jan06.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Qx-international-jan06.jpg . However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- It all seems a bit mad when even an image of the magazine cover on page only about the magazine gets challenged for fair use. From now on I'm not bothered, these endless wrangles about copyright are killing WP and I do not have the energy or time to deal with it. Ash (talk) 23:17, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
LGBT WikiProject newsletter
| File:Red leaves wreath transparent bg.png The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter File:Red leaves wreath transparent bg.png | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||
Delivered on 20:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 20:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Spartacus cover 35th ed.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Spartacus cover 35th ed.jpg . However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
