User talk:Arxyium

Hi Arxyium! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Heart ^(talk) 04:43, 9 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Byzantine-Hungarian War (1163-1168). When removing a maintenance template, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as this change has been reverted. Take a look at getting started to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 19:56, 14 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Thanks for your contributions to Byzantine-Hungarian War (1163-1168). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 03:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Thanks for your contributions to Capture Of Thessalonica (1224). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Opm581 ^{(talk | he/him)} 22:39, 21 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Is it Better Than Before? i

changed it a bit, i don’t know how to

add more Stuff like Related Articles Etc. Arxyium (talk) 18:26, 22 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi Arxyium. Thank you for your work on Capture Of Thessalonica (1224). Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and footnotes, as well as establish notability as per WP:GNG. It has already been deleted, so I will be marking it for deletion. Please feel free to improve it before the deletion takes place. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 11:11, 23 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello, Arxyium

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Mariamnei, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Capture Of Thessalonica (1224), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 11:11, 23 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

The page Capture Of Thessalonica (1224) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator , or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:04, 23 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

The page Battle of South Morava (1191) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator , or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:32, 24 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

A tag has been placed on Capture of Edessa (1031) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 14:29, 15 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

A tag has been placed on Byzantine–Hungarian wars requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 15:14, 15 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Battle of South Morava (1191), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 16:53, 18 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

i was trying to fix the old version of "the early medieval history of the balkans" to

a better version since i felt that i was wrong by keeping the original source, so i therefore wanted to add a "source"

template where i can store the "references" there, so i was trying to replace the older version of "Fine, John Van Antwerp (1991). The Early Medieval Balkans: A Critical Survey from the Sixth to the Late Twelfth Century" with the new version i discovered "John Van Antwerp (1994). The Late Medieval Balkans: A Critical Survey from the Late Twelfth Century to the Ottoman Conquest" Conquest" Arxyium (talk) 17:08, 18 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

The page Anatolian campaign of Philanthropenos (1293–1295) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator , or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:58, 24 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Thanks for your contributions to Byzantine–Hungarian War (1162–1167). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because the text is not referenced inline, only two numbers in the infobox, despite 100+ revisions. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Joy (talk) 23:01, 8 February 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

The page Abbasid invasion of Asia Minor (779) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator , or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:25, 26 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

The page Battle of Caesarea (781) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator , or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:25, 26 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello Arxyium, I'm reaching out to ask if you'd want me to assist with building the draft:Battle of Caesarea (781) article to get it mainspace ready. I can add to the content of the article and provide secondary sources to meet WP:RS standards if that would be helpful to you. Thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anarawd ap Rhodri (talk • contribs) 00:04, 28 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

sure please & thank you, i really need the help. Arxyium (talk) 00:27, 28 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

No problem. I've sought out sources for use and will add details to the sections with relevant references and footnotes in the coming days. Anarawd ap Rhodri (talk) 19:40, 28 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

I really appreciate it. Arxyium (talk) 21:44, 28 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Caesarea page should now be mainspace-ready as it has been sourced and written out. You can move Caesarea to a mainspace article when you are ready to. I've included links to your draft articles on the battle of Gemanikea and the 779 Abbasid Asia Minor Campaign in the background section for when these pages are completed in the future. I can help with those drafts too if you want. Anarawd ap Rhodri (talk) 16:13, 29 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Yeah, i don’t mind you helping with anything, go ahead. and i REALLY appreciate your support i really do. Arxyium (talk) 16:37, 29 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Germanikeia page should be ready to be moved to mainspace now, though i've left a note on renaming the article in the talk section of the page. Anarawd ap Rhodri (talk) 19:52, 30 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

alright, thank you for all the help, i almost forgot about that article. Arxyium (talk) 21:23, 30 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Article moved to mainspace Abbasid invasion of Asia Minor (779) Anarawd ap Rhodri (talk) 18:25, 1 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

I have moved siege of Ancyra page to Mainspace, but if possible can you add the source and reference for the section on the siege itself "Unable to breach the defenses, the siege ended in a Abbasid failure. Suffering from logistical exhaustion & lack of heavy siege engines with the combination of the incoming cold weather in the autumn. The Abbasids under Thumama were forced to break the siege in 777." Most of the sources I have say Thumama invaded as far as Ancyra but they don't go into detail on the siege itself and the length of the siege like this.

Kind regards Anarawd ap Rhodri (talk) 10:01, 7 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

I was wrong on that part, i kinda confused it with the details of the 779 campaign, neither Al-Tabari or Theophanes the Confessor go into detail of this siege. Arxyium (talk) 01:39, 8 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Also, do you think it’s necessary for a Article like the "Rashidun Invasions of Asia Minor" & "Umayyad Invasions of Asia Minor" since it seems many articles are already made on the "Abbasid Invasions of Asia Minor" but just not its own single article as a whole, at this point if it ever comes to that i might just call the possible article "Arab invasions of Asia Minor" including all three Caliphates. Arxyium (talk) 11:05, 9 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Potentially a "catch-em-all" article like that could be useful in the future, but since there are so many recorded invasions into Asia minor between the Umayyads and Abbasids (with some even occurring during the late Rashidun era), for now i'd say its best to have separate articles dealing with the different invasions. Anarawd ap Rhodri (talk) 11:27, 9 June 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation