User talk:Aidhdhdhahahs
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nick Foot have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, https://cluebotng.toolforge.org/?page=View&id=4502909"}]]}">report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nick Foot was changed by Aidhdhdhahahs (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955626 on 2026年04月13日T09:28:28+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:28, 13 April 2026 (UTC) Reply
Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to attempt to make disruptive edits to Wikipedia and trigger the edit filter , as you did at Nick Foot, you may be blocked from editing. Annh07 (talk) 10:21, 13 April 2026 (UTC) Reply
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did with this edit to Nick Foot. ContributeToTheWiki (talk • contribs) 12:15, 14 April 2026 (UTC) Reply
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Lofty abyss 12:16, 14 April 2026 (UTC) Reply - I am building an encyclopaedia. Aidhdhdhahahs (talk) 12:17, 14 April 2026 (UTC) Reply
Aidhdhdhahahs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI )
Request reason:
Because I provided truthful statements to contribute to the growth and development of this site. My edits are backed by credible sources. Aidhdhdhahahs (talk) 08:33, 14 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
Decline reason:
Since you think that your edits were appropriate and sourced, when they were neither, there are no grounds to remove the block. If you want to tell the world your views on any particular individual, that's what social media is for, not Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 08:35, 14 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock }} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Aidhdhdhahahs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI )
Request reason:
Hello. I am here regarding the rejection of my appeal for a wrongful editing block. All my works are truthful with evidence provided and is not "opinionated" as the administrator implied. I will be discussing this matter further. Aidhdhdhahahs (talk) 10:48, 14 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
Decline reason:
Perhaps you will, but not here. Nothing but pure unmitigated vandalism from this account. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 13:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock }} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Aidhdhdhahahs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI )
Request reason:
Hello again. Yes, actually I will be discussing this matter here. The administrator has provided false information regarding my works and contributions to this platform. I would be happy to answer any questions regarding what this individual refers to as "unmitigated vandalism." I will be in touch. Aidhdhdhahahs (talk) 05:05, 15 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
Decline reason:
Procedural decline, only one unblock request at a time... The Bushranger One ping only 04:43, 17 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock }} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Great, since you assert there's no vandalism, you can help correct the record and explain how these edits constitute constructive contributions, in order to prevent any false information about your edits getting around.
Nick foot sucks. Imagine having a body part as ur last name. Butters is gonna be a hawk anyway.
Nick foot sucks he sucks he sucks hee sucks he just sucks. #weallhatenickfoot
Nick foot sucks he sucks he sucks.
Nick foot sucks his wife probably cheats on him.
I'm sure after you detail specifically how these edits are constructive, there's a good chance you will be unblocked at some point. Good luck! CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 21:23, 15 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
Aidhdhdhahahs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI )
Request reason:
Your display of my edits to Nick Foot show truthful information. The governing body of AFL conceded that Foot’s umpiring call was incorrect. He receive backlash by many fans and media outlets. Hence why he "sucks". Regarding my statement "Butters is going to be a Hawk anyway, this has been confirmed with him seeking a move back to his home state. That is not vandalism and is in fact constructive, as many reputable sources have stated this. If this block remains in place, I will continue to access the editing feature whilst operating on a seperate device and IP address. Aidhdhdhahahs (talk) 03:24, 16 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
Decline reason:
...not that it matters, considering you unrepentantly declared intent to sock. Goodbye. The Bushranger One ping only 04:43, 17 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock }} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Just wasting our time now. Edit the same way on a sockpuppet account, you'll get the same treatment. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 16:42, 16 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings/unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined, leading to the posting of this notice.