Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

User talk:Africa40

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 hours ago by 331dot in topic August 2026

Welcome!

Hello, Africa40, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 02:45, 22 July 2018 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: E-Doley (October 5)

[edit ]
Latest comment: 7 years ago 2 comments1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:20, 5 October 2018 (UTC) Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Africa40! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk . If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse , a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:20, 5 October 2018 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ernest Tewelyo (October 9)

[edit ]
Latest comment: 7 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Waggie were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Wikipedia is not a reliable source. A lot of sources are interviews of him (primary sources), or are profiles of him rather than journalistic coverage. Please summarize only from reliable and independent journalistic coverage, and remove the poorly sourced or unsourced content. Thank you!
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Waggie (talk) 04:39, 9 October 2018 (UTC) Reply

Draft:E-Doley concern

[edit ]
Latest comment: 6 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:E-Doley, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 23 January 2020 (UTC) Reply

Draft:Ernest Tewelyo concern

[edit ]
Latest comment: 6 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ernest Tewelyo, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 26 January 2020 (UTC) Reply

Your draft article, Draft:E-Doley

[edit ]
Latest comment: 6 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Africa40. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "E-Doley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 15:16, 24 February 2020 (UTC) Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Ernest Tewelyo

[edit ]
Latest comment: 6 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Africa40. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ernest Tewelyo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 21:39, 25 February 2020 (UTC) Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ernest Akendengue-Tewelyo (August 12)

[edit ]
Latest comment: 1 day ago 1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage : discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable : from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent : not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Ernest Akendengue-Tewelyo to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:50, 12 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

August 2026

[edit ]
Latest comment: 3 hours ago 10 comments2 people in discussion
Information icon

Hello Africa40. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Africa40 . The template {{Paid }} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Africa40|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 10:12, 12 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

Hello 331dot, sorry for the late reply; I hadn't seen the message.
First of all, I apologize for any English errors or awkward phrasing, as English isn't my everyday language; I am using a translator to reply.
I declare that there is no conflict of interest; I am genuinely not being paid for this, and I have never met the subject personally.
In reality, I have been a volunteer for years but am still learning how to contribute properly to Wikipedia—which, in my humble opinion, is a bit difficult when you haven't received guidance or are self-taught.
I would like to contribute more to raising awareness about various people or topics, but I hold back a bit to avoid making too many mistakes. That may well be what drew your attention. Thank you for your understanding, and I am truly sorry for the impression this gives to reviewers.
In the future, I will ask the community to step in and help minimize errors in the contributions I plan to make. Thank you. Africa40 (talk) 07:57, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
We don't mind awkward English, we prefer a few errors over using an AI.
You uploaded an image of Mr. Akendengué-Tewelyo in the proper manner, getting it released from the photographer. Many people don't go to that trouble- thank you- but how did you do that without meeting Mr. Akendengué-Tewelyo? I would just like to clarify. 331dot (talk) 08:14, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
I took the liberty of doing this because I know the renowned photographer Mr James Franck Affolaby, who took the photo; he is in the habit of posting images of the public figures he photographs on his pages, and he kindly gave his permission. I hope this does not cause any issues; if it is deemed inappropriate, I am willing to remove the photo. Once again, in the future, I will be sure to seek your advice before publishing anything—please understand that I am not yet very familiar with how Wikipedia contributions work. Africa40 (talk) 09:00, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
Is that how you selected Mr. Akendengué-Tewelyo to edit about? You wrote about a person the photographer took a picture of? People rarely choose the subjects of their editing at random. 331dot (talk) 09:33, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
As I mentioned, a few years ago I wanted to contribute to various topics, but I found the first one quite difficult; that discouraged me a bit, especially since I wasn't very familiar with how Wikipedia works. I only work on it when my schedule allows. Consequently, I stopped contributing for several years due to my work commitments. Now that I’m on vacation, I have some free time—and having recently learned from the press about Mr. Akendengué-Tewelyo’s significant scientific contribution regarding the economic sovereignty of states, my interest was rekindled, and I decided to revisit the subject while trying to better understand the process. I’ve been wondering how to publish in English, as it’s a procedure I’m completely unfamiliar with and it seems slightly different from the French version of Wikipedia; I’m currently teaching myself through our interactions. I have several other topics in mind, but I wanted to avoid making mistakes like the ones I made with the topic we’re currently discussing. Next time, I’ll know how to go about it better—and, above all, I’ll ask for your advice. Once again, I apologize if my numerous, clumsy corrections gave you a bad impression; that certainly wasn't my intention. Thank you very much. Africa40 (talk) 10:06, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
Thank you. 331dot (talk) 10:28, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
Thank you, too, for your understanding.
Could you please let me know the next steps? Are there any corrections needed for this article? If not, may I resubmit it?
I also noticed that the photo sparked some debate; should I change it?
I would like to avoid making any further mistakes with this submission or with any future contributions.
Thank you in advance. Africa40 (talk) 10:46, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
There is no issue with the image, which was properly uploaded; images are not relevant to the draft process, which only considers the text and sources. You don't need to remove it, it just doesn't aid the draft process.
I will look at the draft later today. 331dot (talk) 11:20, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
Awards do not contribute to notability unless the award itself merits an article(like Nobel Peace Prize or Academy Awards).
Interviews with him are not independent sources, being him speaking about himself, so those do not contribute to notability.
The draft mostly tells of his normal activities as a businessman. We are looking for sources that are independent of him and that provide critical analysis and commentary about him as to what makes him a notable person in a Wikipedia sense. It sounds like he tries to influence the Gabonese or African business community, but we need independent sources that do not include interviews with him to say that and describe what his particular influence is.
It is possible that this draft, if written in French, would be acceptable content on the French Wikipedia. The French Wikipedia has different policies than the English Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 14:56, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /