User talk:Aesurias

Did you delete all of my revisions?

AliasSeaThinker (talk) 00:39, 29 July 2026 (UTC) Reply  

Yes. Please take time to read over the manual of style and our neutral point of view guideline.

Echoing @voorts, I would suggest completing Wikipedia:TWA as a basic introduction to editing.

Your edits included combinations of lengthy unsourced statements and non-neutral language; some particularly egregious examples of this:

• "MAGA's symbolic politics of status embrace a grievance culture that capitalizes on the celebratory sense of pride and belonging created through participation with the MAGA movement by integrating populist talking points that tie MAGA-connected feelings of reclaimed status with specific points polarization: a dynamic of us (MAGA) versus them (anybody or anything that is not MAGA). This populist approach is appealing because it tells people specifically who to blame for their grievances."
• "MAGA's ongoing embrace of the deeply, thoroughly debunked conspiracy theory of the Big Steal is the most prominent collective MAGA delusion. With the context of relentless determination to believe whatever Trump's says is true lies a the bigger issue: MAGA gives Trump the benefit of the doubt as an intentional practice. This practice is particularly dangerous because of Trump's extensively documented and near-constant stream of deceit."

(all emphasis is mine)

Additionally, a source having an opinion on something does not mean that Wikipedia can state that opinion as fact in Wikivoice – "The fallout from Trump's attempt to orchestrate the violent overthrow of a US presidential election continues to cause harm in 2026." should instead read something like "In June 2026, staff writers for The Atlantic wrote that Trump's denial of the 2020 presidential election results has caused lasting repercussions." aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 01:08, 30 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

Draft:What is Aleppo? aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 22:58, 31 July 2026 (UTC) Reply

Information icon Hello, Aesurias. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Haters and losers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

Hey, I saw that you have been editing the VoteHub draft. The submission has been declined a couple of times. I am planning on changing the sources that have the inline citations, but do you have any ideas that could help make the draft be accepted, like things I could change? I have seen what you have edited on other articles before and I think you might know what I can do to help this article be accepted. No pressure but if you could help I would greatly appreciate it MAWJ The Awesome (talk) 07:23, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

The primary issue is that the sources don't demonstrate VoteHub's notability. I could not find better sourcing from my own prior searches, so I am unsure how this can be improved other than just waiting for better sourcing as the organization grows. aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 07:26, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

I'm still gonna try but thanks for writing back, and i appreciate what you have tried and done. If you ever need any help with anything lmk MAWJ The Awesome (talk) 07:55, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Reply