User talk:109.51.252.107
December 2024
[edit ]Information icon Hello, I'm Wiiformii. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Judicael Berengar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Wiiformii (talk) 23:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pope Pius VI. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tarlby (t) (c) 23:43, 26 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
Warning
[edit ]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing —especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Paramandyr (talk) 23:47, 26 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
Your addition of unsourced family member to Papal articles
[edit ]Adding information from Italian Wikipedia doesn't give you consensus. You have been reverted by other editor(s) besides me. You need to get consensus to add this information when you've been consistently reverted, especially when the information is not directly related to the subject's occupation(Pope) of the article and not sourced. Wikipedia is not a genealogical website. --Kansas Bear 22:17, 19 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Block evasion
[edit ]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo bons mots 23:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in .
109.51.252.107 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What's going on? Someone started deleting my edits for no reason and now I get blocked as being another user, who in turn was blocked allegedly for being someone else blocked before. For what I've seen, the edits made by people who I was more or less working with and others I was following to some point and working along with are being deleted on the same grounds. 109.51.252.107 (talk) 23:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you:
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:14, 29 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock }} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
