I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, but I care a lot about free, open access to information for all. It's why I donate to the Internet Archive, (and you should too!) which consequently keeps a lot of citations here on Wikipedia verifiable for years to come, and it's why I made this account in the first place.
I primarily edit topics I care about, but I also engage in a smattering of miscellaneous small fixes and reversions of vandalism when I see them :)
I've recently spent a lot of time on the Rec Room article, as that game was incredibly important to me, and I want to make sure as much of it lives on as possible for all to see, even after it's gone.
I'm also very into investigating government surveillance, civil rights, unchecked corporate power, and technology more broadly, along with progressive social movements and fun internet culture.
I hope to contribute more to Wikipedia as time goes on, because every little bit I or you put into this thing makes a difference for people around the world :)
This user is questioning the sanity of Wikipedia for naming this personalized object a "userbox" even though the object only has dimensions of length and width, excluding height which would mean it's a two-dimensional object, therefore not a "box" because a box is the informal term for a cube, which itself is a three dimensional object, and therefore shan't be called a user "box". Additionally, if one converts the userbox into a three-dimensional object, the dimensions would lead to unequal sides, which do not match the dimensions of a cube, which has all of the sides equal. This is atrocious behaviour conducted by Wikipedia, and it really should be fixed due to the severe inaccuracy and violation of the geometrical rules of math and science. This would feel like ridiculing Stephen Hawking, which is bad and a devastating action. Now this user feels like Aristotle.
This editor is single-handedly attempting to save Wikipedia.
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_new_hue.svg){kind=link}
