Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

User:Lotus in the hills

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User:Lotus in the hills Special:Contributions/Lotus in the hills User:Lotus in the hills/Sandbox User_talk:Lotus in the hills
Lotus's Home Contributions Sandbox Talk
\n-[[User:Lotus in the hills|Lotus]] 20:13, 5 December 2008 (UTC)\n\n==My Sandbox==\nJust set up my own sandbox [[User:Lotus in the hills/Sandbox|here]].\n\n-[[User:Lotus in the hills|Lotus]] 03:35, 3 December 2008 (UTC)\n\n==[[Hindu Law]] Editing Project==\nThis Fall, I will be taking part in a [[University of Wisconsin-Madison|<span style=\"color:#808\">Uni</span><span style=\"color:#00F\">versi</span><span style=\"color:#490\">ty</span> <span style=\"color:#D92\">of</span> <span style=\"color:#D40\">Wisco</span><span style=\"color:#B00\">sin-Madison</span>]] project to edit Wikipedia articles on [[Hindu Law]]. Other folks on my team:\n\n[[User:Badgerblueliner|Badgerblueliner]]<br>\n[[User:SadieBean|SadieBean]]<br>\n[[User:Anelson4|Anelson4]]<br>\n-[[User:Lotus in the hills|Lotus]] 17:41, 15 October 2008 (UTC)\n\n==Diamer-Bhasha Dam==\nJust added a section to the [[Diamer-Bhasha_dam | Diamer-Bhasha Dam]] article about the recent discovery of Buddhist relics there.\n\n-[[User:Lotus in the hills|Lotus]] 11:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)\n\n==Tambiah Article==\nHmmm...the article for [[Stanley Jeyaraja Tambiah|Stanley Tambiah]] doesn't really make much mention of his work on Buddhism. Maybe that needs to be remedied...\n\n-[[User:Lotus in the hills|Lotus]] 21:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)\n\n==Fig-eating Slop==\nHooray! It looks like the [[Richard Gombrich]] article has been cured of its sickeningly sycophantic tone.\n\n-[[User:Lotus in the hills|Lotus]] 16:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)\n\n==Back at it==\nThe [[J. W. de Jong]] article seems to be finishing up pretty nicely; the [[Gombrich]] article needs to be completely retooled. In the mean time, here's a brief hit list of Indologists who still don't have pages:\n\n*Helmuth von Glasenapp<br>\n*J.Ph. Vogel<br>\n*Erich Frauwallner<br>\n*Otto Strauss<br>\n*Otto Stein<br>\n*Oskar von Hinüber<br>\n*Bimala C. Law<br>\n*Padmanabh S. Jaini\n\nAnd a list of some Indologist articles which barely make it to stub status:\n\n*[[Hermann Oldenberg]]<br>\n*[[Paul Deussen]]<br>\n*[[K. R. Norman]]<br>\n*[[Moriz Winternitz]]<br>\n*[[Louis Renou]]<br>\n*[[Sylvain Lévi]]<br>\n*[[Étienne Lamotte]]\n\n-[[User:Lotus in the hills|Lotus]] 17:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)\n\n==A bit of a quandary...==\nI've been working on biographical articles for scholars in Buddhist Studies for a while now, and just lately I've run into the problem of how to group them all. I've simply been categorizing them as \"Indologists\" since no \"Buddhologist\" category exists and I'm hesitant to create one. As it stands now, some scholars are found under lists of \"Orientalists,\" some under lists of \"Tibetologists,\" and some under \"Indologists.\" All of these categories have there problems (Indology and Tibetology are plagued by the usual demons which trouble categories in Area Studies, Orientalism is now a wicked thing and I don't think that the title of \"Orientalist\" can be rehabilitated without a good deal of effort). So...any ideas?\n<br>-[[User:Lotus in the hills|Lotus]] 00:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)\n\n",{"template":{"target":{"wt":"userboxbottom","href":"./Template:Userboxbottom"},"params":{},"i":1}},"\n|}"]}'>
Lotus's Wikiblog
Please enter comments or replies on my discussion page

Sten Konow

[edit ]

He does not have a Wikipedia page, as far as I know. Another famous Orientalist and former Indian Government Epigraphist to work on! -Lotus 22:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Orientalists and WWII

[edit ]

Planning on working on the Erich Frauwallner page and creating a page for Otto Stein. I think it will be an interesting task, juxtaposing an Orientalist who supported the Nazis with one who died in a Jewish ghetto. -Lotus 19:57, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Textual accounts of ācāra

[edit ]

Added a small section with textual references to local custom from Dharmaśāstra texts to the ācāra entry. -Lotus 06:35, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Renunciation in the Dharmaśāstras

[edit ]

I'm adding a section to the Sannyasin page about rules governing renunciation in Dharma literature. There is already a brief "Applications" section on the page, which could use revision. -Lotus 19:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Monarchy in Ancient India

[edit ]

Just created the Monarchy in Ancient India page, more on kingship in the Dharmaśāstras to go up soon!
-Lotus 20:13, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

My Sandbox

[edit ]

Just set up my own sandbox here.

-Lotus 03:35, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Hindu Law Editing Project

[edit ]

This Fall, I will be taking part in a University of Wiscosin-Madison project to edit Wikipedia articles on Hindu Law. Other folks on my team:

Badgerblueliner
SadieBean
Anelson4
-Lotus 17:41, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Diamer-Bhasha Dam

[edit ]

Just added a section to the Diamer-Bhasha Dam article about the recent discovery of Buddhist relics there.

-Lotus 11:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Tambiah Article

[edit ]

Hmmm...the article for Stanley Tambiah doesn't really make much mention of his work on Buddhism. Maybe that needs to be remedied...

-Lotus 21:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Fig-eating Slop

[edit ]

Hooray! It looks like the Richard Gombrich article has been cured of its sickeningly sycophantic tone.

-Lotus 16:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Back at it

[edit ]

The J. W. de Jong article seems to be finishing up pretty nicely; the Gombrich article needs to be completely retooled. In the mean time, here's a brief hit list of Indologists who still don't have pages:

  • Helmuth von Glasenapp
  • J.Ph. Vogel
  • Erich Frauwallner
  • Otto Strauss
  • Otto Stein
  • Oskar von Hinüber
  • Bimala C. Law
  • Padmanabh S. Jaini

And a list of some Indologist articles which barely make it to stub status:

-Lotus 17:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

A bit of a quandary...

[edit ]

I've been working on biographical articles for scholars in Buddhist Studies for a while now, and just lately I've run into the problem of how to group them all. I've simply been categorizing them as "Indologists" since no "Buddhologist" category exists and I'm hesitant to create one. As it stands now, some scholars are found under lists of "Orientalists," some under lists of "Tibetologists," and some under "Indologists." All of these categories have there problems (Indology and Tibetology are plagued by the usual demons which trouble categories in Area Studies, Orientalism is now a wicked thing and I don't think that the title of "Orientalist" can be rehabilitated without a good deal of effort). So...any ideas?
-Lotus 00:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Stuff

[edit ]
Languages
Wikipedia:Babel
en This user is a native speaker of the English language .
el-3 Αυτός ο χρήστης μπορεί να συνεισφέρει σε ανωτέρου επιπέδου ελληνικά .
km-2 អ្នកប្រើប្រាស់ ដែលអាច រួមចំណែក ភាសាខ្មែរ ថ្នាក់មធ្យម
si-1 This user is able to contribute with a basic level of Sinhala .
hi-2 इस उपयोगकर्ता को हिन्दी भाषा का मध्यम स्तर का ज्ञान है।
Search user languages
Misc.
This user is a Buddhist .
This user tries to do the right thing. If they make a mistake, please let them know .
This user is of Greek ancestry.
This user prefers warm weather.
This user eats sushi .
This user is a bibliophile .

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /