Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

User:Jeff Carr

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Freedom is good. I am wit@wit.com if you wish to email me.

Wikipedia:Meetup

Reminder of some wiki syntax:

{{NoMultiLicense}}
{{CurrentTime}}
{{PhilosophyTasksBox}}
[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Anti-war]]
[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Critical Theory]]
[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Neuroscience]]
[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Drugs]]
[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Doctor Who]]
[[Wikipedia:MozEx tutorial]]
[[Wikipedia:how-to]]
[[WP:LIVINIG]]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Pages_needing_expert_attention Pages that need experts]
[[inclusionist]]
{{Boxboxtop|[[Wikipedia:Userboxes|Userboxes]]}}
{{User:The Raven's Apprentice/Userboxes/User Metric}}
<div style="float: left; border:solid {{{1|{{{border-c|{{{id-c|#999999}}}}}}}}} 1px; margin: 1px;">
{| cellspacing="0" style="width: 238px; background: {{{2|{{{info-c|#eeeeee}}}}}};"
| style="width: 45px; height: 45px; background: {{{1|{{{id-c|#dddddd}}}}}}; text-align: center; font-size: {{{5|{{{id-s|14}}}}}}pt; color: {{{id-fc|black}}};" | '''{{{3|incl}}}'''
| style="font-size: {{{info-s|8}}}pt; padding: 4pt; line-height: 1.25em; color: {{{info-fc|black}}};" | {{{4|This [[:Category:Inclusionist Wikipedians|user]] is a Wikipedia '''[[M:Inclusionism|inclusionist]]'''.}}}
|}</div>
{{user DAR}}
{{User:Disavian/Userboxes/Not Censored}}
{{User Recently Discovered Userboxes}}
{{Boxboxbottom}}
{{user infobox}}
{{Calm}}
2010-{{CURRENTMONTH}}-{{CURRENTDAY}} || {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} || '''{{formatnum:{{#expr: {{NUMBEROFARTICLES:R}}-3144000}}}}'''<ref group="a" name="a">Calculated live, so far, as only for partial year.</ref> 


Against voluntary dual-licensing
I am against voluntary dual-licensing of Wikipedia contributions.

01:41


  • Optimism should have a separate page that focuses on the philosophical idea of optimism and distinguishes the philosophical view from "positive thinking" and other everyday uses of the word.
  • Philosophy of social science , has some okay points but requires elaboration on Wittgenstein and Winch, perhaps other linguistic critiques, whether logical positivist or postmodernist.
  • Exchange value needs to be redone, it shouldn't be under 'Marxist theory'- although it's an important component of Marxist theory it's also vital for all economics. That said the article's weight on Marx is also absurd.
  • German Idealism and the articles related to it may need to be rewritten or expanded to avoid undue weight on Arthur Schopenhauer.
  • Protected values first section confuses right action and values and needs a copy edit, moving and wikifying
  • Quality (philosophy) needs a more clear explanation.
  • Socratic dialogues could do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change.
  • Problem of universals: The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version.
  • Teleology: the article is shallow and inconsistent.
  • Existentialism: the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention.
  • Analytic philosophy This is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered.
  • Lifeworld A philosophical concept that seems to have fallen exclusively into the hands of the sociologists. Could use some attention; it's a major and complex issue in phenomenology.
  • Perception Needs the attention of philosophically minded Wikipedians. This is only the start of an overhaul of perception and related articles.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Anti-war Wikipedia:WikiProject Critical Theory Wikipedia:WikiProject Neuroscience Wikipedia:WikiProject Drugs Wikipedia:WikiProject Doctor Who Wikipedia:MozEx tutorial Wikipedia:how-to


Pages that need experts

inclusionist

This user prefers the metric system.
incl This user is a Wikipedia inclusionist .
dar This editor is a darwikinist .
Wikipedia is not censored.
This user recently discovered how to use userboxes.
Jeff Carr
— Wikipedian  —
[画像:Peace dove with olive branch in its beak] Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.



AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /