Univalent function
In mathematics, in the branch of complex analysis, a holomorphic function on an open subset of the complex plane is called univalent if it is injective.[1] [2]
Examples
[edit ]The function {\displaystyle f\colon z\mapsto 2z+z^{2}} is univalent in the open unit disc, as {\displaystyle f(z)=f(w)} implies that {\displaystyle f(z)-f(w)=(z-w)(z+w+2)=0}. As the second factor is non-zero in the open unit disc, {\displaystyle z=w} so {\displaystyle f} is injective.
Basic properties
[edit ]One can prove that if {\displaystyle G} and {\displaystyle \Omega } are two open connected sets in the complex plane, and
- {\displaystyle f:G\to \Omega }
is a univalent function such that {\displaystyle f(G)=\Omega } (that is, {\displaystyle f} is surjective), then the derivative of {\displaystyle f} is never zero, {\displaystyle f} is invertible, and its inverse {\displaystyle f^{-1}} is also holomorphic. More, one has by the chain rule
- {\displaystyle (f^{-1})'(f(z))={\frac {1}{f'(z)}}}
for all {\displaystyle z} in {\displaystyle G.}
Comparison with real functions
[edit ]For real analytic functions, unlike for complex analytic (that is, holomorphic) functions, these statements fail to hold. For example, consider the function
- {\displaystyle f:(-1,1)\to (-1,1),円}
given by {\displaystyle f(x)=x^{3}}. This function is clearly injective, but its derivative is 0 at {\displaystyle x=0}, and its inverse is not analytic, or even differentiable, on the whole interval {\displaystyle (-1,1)}. Consequently, if we enlarge the domain to an open subset {\displaystyle G} of the complex plane, it must fail to be injective; and this is the case, since (for example) {\displaystyle f(\varepsilon \omega )=f(\varepsilon )} (where {\displaystyle \omega } is a primitive cube root of unity and {\displaystyle \varepsilon } is a positive real number smaller than the radius of {\displaystyle G} as a neighbourhood of {\displaystyle 0}).
See also
[edit ]- Biholomorphic mapping – Bijective holomorphic function with a holomorphic inversePages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
- De Branges's theorem – Statement in complex analysis; formerly the Bieberbach conjecture
- Koebe quarter theorem – Statement in complex analysis
- Riemann mapping theorem – Mathematical theorem
- Nevanlinna's criterion – Characterization of starlike univalent holomorphic functions
Note
[edit ]- ^ (Conway 1995, p. 32, chapter 14: Conformal equivalence for simply connected regions, Definition 1.12: "A function on an open set is univalent if it is analytic and one-to-one.")
- ^ (Nehari 1975)
References
[edit ]- Conway, John B. (1995). "Conformal Equivalence for Simply Connected Regions". Functions of One Complex Variable II. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 159. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0817-4. ISBN 978-1-4612-6911-3.
- "Univalent Functions". Sources in the Development of Mathematics. 2011. pp. 907–928. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511844195.041. ISBN 9780521114707.
- Duren, P. L. (1983). Univalent Functions. Springer New York, NY. p. XIV, 384. ISBN 978-1-4419-2816-0.
- Gong, Sheng (1998). Convex and Starlike Mappings in Several Complex Variables. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5206-8. ISBN 978-94-010-6191-9.
- Jarnicki, Marek; Pflug, Peter (2006). "A remark on separate holomorphy". Studia Mathematica. 174 (3): 309–317. arXiv:math/0507305 . doi:10.4064/SM174-3-5 . S2CID 15660985.
- Nehari, Zeev (1975). Conformal mapping. New York: Dover Publications. p. 146. ISBN 0-486-61137-X. OCLC 1504503.
This article incorporates material from univalent analytic function on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.