Template talk:Southern Conference football champions
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject College football , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
"And" versus "Or" for Co-Champions
[edit ]Is there an established style for these templates where we list co-champions as "X or Y" as opposed to "X and Y"? The "or" reads a bit odd to me, and I spot checked a couple other conferences and couldn't find a similar template to see if we're consistent with it. Chuy1530 (talk) 23:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC) [reply ]
- I don't believe so. There are others but they are also made by me, of which I know. 'Or' is just shorter than 'and/or', and the slashes don't look pretty. Cake (talk) 00:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC) [reply ]
- Yeah, looking at it again 'and' doesn't really look any better and 'or' is much better than 'and/or'. It just read funny to me at first. Chuy1530 (talk) 23:01, 11 December 2015 (UTC) [reply ]
- Oops, I see now you went with &, which I didn't think of and looks better than anything I thought up. Awesome :) Chuy1530 (talk) 23:02, 11 December 2015 (UTC) [reply ]
- I didn't choose the ampersand, but I agree. Cake (talk) 15:43, 12 December 2015 (UTC) [reply ]
- Oops, I see now you went with &, which I didn't think of and looks better than anything I thought up. Awesome :) Chuy1530 (talk) 23:02, 11 December 2015 (UTC) [reply ]
- Yeah, looking at it again 'and' doesn't really look any better and 'or' is much better than 'and/or'. It just read funny to me at first. Chuy1530 (talk) 23:01, 11 December 2015 (UTC) [reply ]