Template talk:Navbox track gauge
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please correct
[edit ]- 1668 is really (5 ft 52⁄3 in)
Peter Horn 22:22, 16 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- 3000 or 3,000 mm (9 ft 10+1⁄8 in) is really (9 ft 101⁄8 in)
121.102.47.39 (talk) 12:17, 11 June 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- 3000 or 3,000 mm (9 ft 10+1⁄8 in) is really 3,000 mm (9 ft 101⁄8 in)
121.102.47.39 (talk) 02:26, 23 June 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- 1980 is really 1,980 mm (6 ft 519⁄20 in)
- 1981 is really 1,981 mm (6 ft 6 in)
- 6 ft 6 in (1,981 mm) is really 6 ft 6 in (1,981 mm)
220.210.143.190 (talk) 14:10, 28 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- 10 ft (3,048 mm) or 9ft10.11in is really 9 ft 101⁄8 in (3,000 mm)
220.210.143.190 (talk) 13:03, 8 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Requested move
[edit ]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:52, 2 December 2011 (UTC) [reply ]
Template:Rail gauges → Template:Track gauge – Per Talk:Track_gauge#Requested_move. HTML2011 (talk) 22:52, 24 November 2011 (UTC) [reply ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Why does it not work?
[edit ]Why does Imperial work i.e. lead to "Summary" and Imperial not work i.e. not lead to "imperial (762 mm/2 ft 6 in)"? Peter Horn User talk 01:59, 14 April 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- Imperial does work. Peter Horn User talk 18:41, 14 April 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- Imperial should have read Imperial. Peter Horn User talk 05:15, 1 January 2013 (UTC) [reply ]
2' isn't minimum gauge
[edit ]2' and 600mm are generally considered to be narrow gauge. 18" to 101⁄4" are considered, and referenceable via Heywood, as minimum gauge,but not above this. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:08, 2 October 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
Bosnian gauge
[edit ]Bosnian gauge compare 760 and 760 mm (2 ft 5.92 in). It should perhaps be 2 ft 515⁄16 in. Peter Horn User talk 05:02, 1 January 2013 (UTC) [reply ]
Limiting the list?
[edit ]Currently, Peter Horn is adding more gauges to this box [1]. Now the whole #List_of_defined_track_gauges has 248 entries. Would it be really helpful if all these are listed here? So far, I don't see much ov er view in a long list of lengthes. Could we find cut-off criteria? -DePiep (talk) 16:54, 1 May 2021 (UTC) [reply ]
Why
[edit ]Why does the latest revision 1,945 mm (6 ft 4+9⁄16 in) not show where ever this template is used in any article? Peter Horn User talk 01:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC) Peter Horn User talk 01:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- You may need to purge the page transcluding the template, or wait for the software to catch up (usually a few hours). It seems to be working in (for example) Dual gauge. — Voice of Clam (talk) 06:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- However looking at your addition, it only points to a specific locomotive - I don't see the need for this unless there's a corresponding Dutch broad gauge article, in which case the template should link to that instead. — Voice of Clam (talk) 06:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC) [reply ]