Template talk:Hypothetical Indo-European subfamilies

WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Languages , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage

WikiProject icon Europe

Indo-Hittite isn't so much a "hypothetical subfamily" as a hypothetical superfamily, and should maybe be listed separately. dab (ᛏ) 07:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC) [reply ]

This goes double for Indo-Uralic, and including it while leaving out other external relationship proposals seems slightly POV really. --Trɔpʏliʊm • blah 15:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Although Balto-Slavic is, strictly speaking, a hypothetical IE subfamily, including it here with subgroupings that do not enjoy widespread support is misleading. Except for a few nationalists who don't understand or care about linguistics, Balto-Slavic is about as widely accepted among Indo-Europeanists as Indo-Iranian, which I notice is not on this list. Therefore, I'm removing it from the template (just as the template has already been removed from the article Balto-Slavic languages). Alternatively, Indo-Iranian could be added to the template. —An gr 14:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Why not use Navbox template?

{{Navbox
 |name = {{subst:PAGENAME}}
 |title = Hypothetical{{-}}[[Indo-European languages|Indo-European]]{{-}}phylogenetic clades
 |style = width:auto;float:right;margin:0em 0em 0em 1em;
 |list1 = [[Daco-Thracian]]
 |list2 = [[Graeco-Aryan]]
 |list3 = [[Graeco-Armenian]]
 |list4 = [[Italo-Celtic]]
 |list5 = [[Thraco-Illyrian]]
 |list6 = <hr/>
 |list7 = [[Indo-Hittite]]
}}
<noinclude>
[[Category:Linguistics templates|Indo-European]]
[[id:Templat:Subrumpun hipotetis bahasa Indo-Eropa]]
</noinclude>

Greets from Munich, Bavarjan (talk) 11:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

As noone says anything and everything is reverable in Wikipedia, I'll just do it... Bavarjan (talk) 18:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC) [reply ]