Template:Did you know nominations/Council of Tripoli

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 01:47, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

• ... that summons to the Council of Tripoli were issued in the name of the Church to bypass the issue of whether a king could summon a prince?
  Source: "But Tancred owed no allegiance to king Baldwin. Therefore Baldwin summoned him in the high name of the church of Jerusalem..." (Fink 1969, p. 397)
  • ALT1: ... that, whether consciously or by chance, the Council of Tripoli revived the border between two uninvolved states?
  • ALT2: ... that the Council of Tripoli has been interpreted as a sign of a "formal confraternity" between the Christian rulers of the Middle East?
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Reactions to the 2024 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses
  • Comment: Nominating Borsoka's work which I just noticed. Hopefully it can be forgiven for being a bit stale.

Surtsicna (talk) 19:22, 14 January 2025 (UTC).

• I really like ALT0 but all should be good as far as interest goes. I'm personally fine with giving a few days leeway on the nomination as well. Would you be able to pull the sources for the hooks? And place them here? I'm fine with looking for them myself but it'll be best for then prep builders and queuers will be working on it as well. ~Darth Stabro ^{Talk  • Contribs} 02:43, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Certainly, Darth Stabro. Cited for ALT0, which I too think is best. Surtsicna (talk) 08:20, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

ALT0 approved, Nihil obstat. ~Darth Stabro ^{Talk  • Contribs} 14:42, 22 January 2025 (UTC)