Template:Content

The relevance of particular information in (or previously in) this article or section is disputed . The information may have been removed or included by an editor as a result. Please see discussion on the talk page considering whether its inclusion is warranted. (March 2025)

Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

This template will categorise articles into Category:Accuracy disputes.

This template is a self-reference.

This template is not useful for Wikipedia:Subst.

Usage

This tag should be used when it is believed that particular information being deleted from an article is relevant and therefore should be allowed in the article. Importantly, the tag lets readers know they may not be getting the full story due to the exclusion of that piece of information. On the article's Discussion page, note the information you believe should be included before placing the tag.

The tag may assist in moving the dispute to the talk page, and reduce edit-warring, preventing piece(s) of information being repetitively inserted and deleted. If a consensus is reached that the information is not notable and relevant, the information is not added and the tag is removed. If a consensus is reached that the information is notable and relevant, the information is inserted in the article and the tag is removed.

Use {{Content}} to add the above message box to the top of an article or section.
Use {{Content|Talk page section}} to add the message box and link directly to the related section on the talk page.

Wikipedia project pages

Templates

Main page: Wikipedia:Template index/Disputes

Disputed factual accuracy

Both accuracy and POV

Boxes:
- {{Controversial }} Talk page

Disputed neutrality (POV)

Wiki

v t e Citation and verifiability article maintenance templates
Sourcing	{{Circular}} {{Better sources needed}} {{Dubious}} {{Excessive citations}} {{Further reading cleanup}} {{Independent sources}} {{More citations needed}} {{More citations needed section}} {{More footnotes needed}} {{No footnotes}} {{No reliable sources}} {{No significant coverage}} {{One source}} {{One source section}} {{Only primary sources}} {{NRIS only}} {{Primary sources}} {{Primary sources section}} {{Religious text primary}} {{Self-published}} {{Self-reference cleanup}} {{Self-sourcing examples}} {{Refexample section}} {{Sources exist}} {{Text-source}} {{Unreferenced}} {{Unreferenced section}} {{Unreferenced category}} {{Unreliable sources}} {{Unreliable sources section}} {{User-generated}}
BLP-specific	{{BLP unreferenced}} {{BLP unreferenced section}} {{BLP primary sources}} {{BLP self-published}} {{BLP sources}} {{BLP sources section}} {{BLP IMDb-only refimprove}} {{BLP IMDb refimprove}} {{BLP no footnotes}} {{BLP more footnotes needed}} {{BLP one source}}
Topic specific	{{Localist}} {{Media IMDb refimprove}} {{More medical citations needed}} {{More science citations needed}} {{Neologism}} {{Science review}} {{Unreferenced law}} {{Unreferenced-law section}} {{Unreferenced medical section}}
Dispute-related	{{Cite check}} {{Cite check section}} {{Content}} {{Disputed}} {{Dispute about}} {{Disputed section}} {{Disputed chem}} {{Disputed list}} {{Disputed map}} {{Expert needed}} {{Hoax}} {{Original research}} {{Original research section}} {{Speculation}} {{Speculation section}} {{Synthesis}} {{Verifiability}} {{Verify sources}}
Citation improvements	{{Citation style}} {{Citations broken}} {{Cleanup bare URLs}} {{Format footnotes}} {{Full citations needed}} {{Ibid}} {{Page numbers improve}} {{Page numbers needed}} {{Shallow references}}
General advice	Citing sources Reliable sources Maintenance template removal Citation needed Find sources Combining sources Referencing styles

v
t
e

Inline cleanup tags

Attribution

Clarity

Miscellaneous

Neutrality

Precision

{{By how much }} {{Definition }} {{Definition needed }} {{Example needed }} {{Example needed span }} {{Explain }} {{How }} {{How often }} {{Misquoted }} {{Quantify }} {{Specify }} {{Vague }} {{When }} {{Where }} {{Which }} {{Who else }} {{Why }} {{Year needed }}
Excessive	{{Overly detailed inline }} {{Duplication span }} {{Importance inline }} {{Relevance inline }} {{Undue weight inline }} {{Globalize inline }} {{Infobox clutter }}

Time-sensitivity

Verifiability

Dubious	{{Contradictory inline }} {{Disputed inline }} {{Dubious }} {{Dubious span }} {{Inconsistent }} {{Needs independent confirmation }} {{Speculation inline }}
Bare URLs	{{Bare URL inline }} {{Bare URL non-HTML }} {{Bare URL AV media }} {{Bare URL PDF }} {{Bare URL image }} {{Bare URL DOC }} {{Bare URL plain text }} {{Bare URL spreadsheet }}
Incomplete or broken citation	{{Author incomplete }} {{Author missing }} {{Date missing }} {{Dead link }} {{Edition needed }} {{Episode needed }} {{Full citation needed }} {{Incomplete short citation }} {{ISBN missing }} {{Moved resource }} {{Page needed }} {{Permanent dead link }} {{Place missing }} {{Publisher missing }} {{Season needed }} {{Time needed }} {{Title incomplete }} {{Title missing }} {{Unused source }} {{Volume needed }} {{Year missing }}
Missing or problematic reference	{{Additional citation needed }} {{Better source needed }} {{Better source needed example }} {{Check quotation }} {{Chronology citation needed }} {{Circular reference }} {{Citation needed }} {{Citation needed span }} {{Citation not found }} {{Close paraphrasing inline }} {{COI source }} {{Deprecated inline }} {{Excessive citations inline }} {{Failed verification }} {{Failed verification span }} {{Image reference needed }} {{Irrelevant citation }} {{Medical citation needed }} {{Medical citation needed span }} {{Nonspecific }} {{Not verified in body }} {{Obsolete source }} {{Page range too broad }} {{Primary source inline }} {{Promotional source }} {{Quote without source }} {{Request quotation }} {{Request quotation span }} {{Retracted }} {{Scientific citation needed }} {{Self-published inline }} {{Shallow reference inline }} {{Tertiary source inline }} {{Third-party inline }} {{Unreliable fringe source }} {{Unreliable medical source }} {{Unreliable source? }} {{Verify quote }} {{Verify source }}

Wording

General advice

v
t
e

Toolbox

Templates

Welcome	{{subst:Welcome}} {{subst:Welcomeh}} {{subst:Welcome-anon}} {{subst:W-graphical-anon}} {{subst:Welcome-anon-unconstructive}} {{subst:Welcome-anon-npov}} {{subst:welcome-t}} {{subst:thanks}}
Vandalism	{{subst:uw-vandalism1}} {{subst:uw-vandalism2}} {{subst:uw-vandalism3}} {{subst:uw-vandalism4}} {{subst:uw-vandalism4im}}
Content removal	{{subst:uw-delete1}} {{subst:uw-delete2}} {{subst:uw-delete3}} {{subst:uw-delete4}} {{subst:uw-delete4im}}
Check	{{subst:Copyvio\|url=source}} {{Db\|...}} {{Di-no license }} {{Di-no source }}
Dispute	{{Citation needed }} {{Controversial }} {{Disputed }} {{Fringe theories }} {{POV }} {{Unreferenced section }} {{Promotional }} {{Multiple issues }}
Delete	{{subst:afd}} {{subst:cfd}} {{ffd }} {{mfd }} {{subst:rfd}} {{subst:tfd}} {{subst:proposed deletion}}

Community

Protocols

Main

Stats

Statistics
- Site map

External

HTML to Wiki Converter for Tables

Wikipedia:Directories and indexes

The above documentation is transcluded from Template:Content/doc. (edit | history)
Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (create | mirror) and testcases (create) pages.
Add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Content&oldid=1088342529"

Usage

See also

Wikipedia project pages

Templates

Disputed factual accuracy

Both accuracy and POV

Disputed neutrality (POV)

Wiki