Talk:XenForo

I think we need a greater variety of sources for this topic. $-vrt (talk) 14:07, 20 December 2010 (UTC) Reply

This page is constantly being vandalised by who we believe to be the same perpetrator. I have reversed all of their edits and will continue to do so. Mr Brogan (talk) 19:09, 16 April 2011 (UTC) Reply

Would someone please stop the person who is consistently vandalizing please? This is becoming absurd! Looking at the history changes for this page, the user with the IP 69.255.242.121 consistently adds himself as a developer and furthermore consistently claims XenForo stole code from vBulletin (which in my opinion is completely false, but to be fair, that issue is presently in litigation) and states it as fact. --ManagerJosh (talk) 21:37, 24 December 2011 (UTC) Reply

I had put an IPA guide to help with pronunciation on here, back around when the article had been created. I can't seem to find it in the history, but was it removed or deemed unneeded? Chousho (talk) 01:16, 29 April 2012 (UTC) Reply

In an attempt to add Ashley Busby (XenForo's Business Manager) to the InfoBox, I didn't manage.

Would it be logical to add him there. If someone could go look at how I tried to add it an fix it that would be great.

After all, he is one of the owners of the company.

Reference to his business manager status: ^[1]

Anonwikimaster (talk) 11:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC) Reply

Feel free to add your own post, but maybe some things that could be added.

1. A release history table which accounts for the Official XenForo add ons - (The Resource Manager, Enhanced Search) 2. Information about the license validation system. 3. Pricing information about licenses and official add ons. (Which can be updated if need be)

Anonwikimaster (talk) 11:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC) Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on XenForo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120513153904/http://www.xenforo.name/ to http://www.xenforo.name/
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130303004433/http://gracelaw.com:80/NewsXF.html to http://gracelaw.com/NewsXF.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck }}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC) Reply

i have installed a latest version of xenforo 2x its amazing software security wise its very high ranked but many developers give a many addons to customize the the xenforo in different shapes but its has also cool styles i have forum of https://xenforo.asia/ you can get free a latest vesrion styles and addon and tip s — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spudys (talk • contribs) 11:19, 8 April 2019 (UTC) Reply

Shouldn't something be added about the fact that XenForo is now actively policing the content and speech of external sites using XenForo forum software and revoking paid for licenses at whim? In addition to using a license agreement in which they vaguely reserve the right for "automated checks" to verify licenses, and include reporting on the "usage" of installations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.37.107 (talk) 22:41, 4 December 2021 (UTC) Reply