Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:We're Here Because We're Here (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums , an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tracklisting

[edit ]

Seeing as we've hit the three-revert rule point, this is necessary. The listed tracklist came from the Anathema website years ago and was at the time even claimed to be the "current vision" (the "current vision" having been at the time to be a two-disc release, and we haven't heard anything about that since). This picture was posted on Anathema's producer's blog. Very few of the names match up, so any tracklisting is, at this point, rumor, due to a lack of recent confirmation and due to a conflict of official claims. DrSturm (talk) 03:07, 30 April 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

I guess since there's no official track listing, then I shall keep it as it is. Sorry about that reversion stretch. Backtable Speak to Me about what I have done 03:35, 30 April 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

Genre

[edit ]

I recently came across an edit on this page stating that this album is "post-progressive" music. Fortunately, that is a redirect to New prog, so I won't dismiss it as I did last time. However, there needs to be a consensus reached as to whether it is post-progressive or alternateive rock and progressive rock. Sources would be cool. I do not want this to turn into another ugly genre battle. In the meantime, I will re-add the invisible template that I put in that genre section beforehand, because atmospheric rock is still not a viable option, considering how it is not acknowledged by wikipedia and doesn't have its own article or section of an article on wikipedia. Backtable Speak to me concerning my deeds. 22:33, 14 June 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Singles?

[edit ]

What were the singles from this album? The youtube upload (by their record company, it seems) of the vidclip for "Dreaming Light" describes it as the second single... begging the obvious question. 84.203.34.111 (talk) 02:23, 19 October 2012 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /