Talk:Ubuntu One
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Hydrargyrum in topic Further updating needed
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ubuntu One article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
- Add new text under old text.
- New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
- Assume good faith
- Be polite and avoid personal attacks
- Be welcoming to newcomers
- Seek dispute resolution if needed
Article policies
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Since Canonical announced the shutdown of some of the services of Ubuntu One in April 2014, these services should be described in the past tense in the article, while some service continue in the present tense. I took a stab at updating the article today. a couple of days after the file storage service went into "read-only" mode in anticipation of the final closure, but the features are so interwoven in the article that it is difficult to do. If someone has the time and inclination, the discontinued features should be separated from the features that still work after June 1, 2014, so that one section can be written in the present tense and the other in the past tense. — Quicksilver T @ 21:33, 3 June 2014 (UTC) Reply