Talk:Tokyopop

Here is a listing of Tokyopop's out of print listing: http://www.tokyopop.com/corporate/biz_dev/447 - It could be helpful in sourcing that certain volumes are no longer available. WhisperToMe (talk) 03:30, 11 September 2009 (UTC) Reply

Cross check it with that --KrebMarkt 17:06, 13 October 2009 (UTC) Reply

Under criticism, the only subject mentioned is Americanisation. While deliberate edits, to censor or otherwise modify, are stupid and bad to include that and not the main criticism...
The main problem with tokyopop is that, while they obviously take care in the quality of the paper, printing and all that and are very good at finding and licensing really good and popular manga, they are notoriously bad at the absolutely most important point of all:
The translation.

They are, in general, the worst company, when it comes to the translations. Even without looking at censorship and bad localization decisions.
...and I am certainly not alone in saying that.
Given this, I am always saddened whenever they license a title, as it pretty much assures, that it will not get a good translation, as other companies can't translate it, and most scanlators won't.
I never, ever, buy anything from them.--213.113.51.11 (talk) 03:55, 13 October 2010 (UTC) Reply

• And we can't include any of that, unless you find reliable sources that talk about it. WhisperToMe (talk) 18:35, 31 October 2010 (UTC) Reply

Considering that Tokyopop Germany is functionally a separate entity with its own officers, licenses, etc., and that much of the current article does not apply to it, is it worthwhile to reorganize the article to more clearly separate it from the main company? Would it be appropriate to give it its own infobox? - JRBrown (talk) 00:53, 6 May 2011 (UTC) Reply

• Since Tokyopop US and UK are now defunct, I'd say that it does deserve its own infobox and/or article (if there's enough info to make a standalone entry). Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:53, 19 August 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79Reply

http://www.animefringe.com/magazine/00.06/feature/1/index.php3 making aplace to post refs. heres one that might interest someone.Lucia Black (talk) 05:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC) Reply

This is a reference removed from the article as it can not be retrieved using wayback due to robots.txt.

• <ref>{{cite web | url=http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/12/12/more-layoffs-at-tokyopop/ | title=More layoffs at Tokyopop | first=Heidi | last=McDonald | publisher=[[Publishers Weekly]] | work=The Beat: The News Blog of Comics Culture | date=2008年12月12日 | accessdate=2008年12月12日}} {{Dead link|date=September 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref>

- Knowledgekid87 (talk) 23:53, 8 July 2015 (UTC) Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tokyopop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore }} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots |deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110418185520/http://www.comicsbeat.com:80/2011/04/15/end-of-an-era-tokyopop-shutting-down/ to http://www.comicsbeat.com/2011/04/15/end-of-an-era-tokyopop-shutting-down/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check }} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:41, 19 October 2015 (UTC) Reply