Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down!

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A fact from Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down! appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 April 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/April.
Wikipedia
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film . If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Spanish cinema task force .

NC-17

[edit ]

It was also instrumental in creating the NC-17 rating, along with Henry & June in light of a lawsuit brought on by Miramax and Almodóvar to the MPAA for being certified with an X rating, which carried the stigma of being associated with pornography.

Is there a source for this? I saw this mentioned on Almodovar's page, too, but I didn't see any mention of this lawsuit or movie over on the NC-17 page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.38.216.134 (talk) 23:15, 23 July 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

[edit ]

The IMDB listing for this movie is now just "¡Átame!" . A search for "Tie me up Tie me down" brings up just the "¡Átame!" page so I'm going to change the link on this page to reflect that. Coradon (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC).[reply ]

There is a lot of interpretation in this article. It needs to be cleaned up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.105.45.240 (talk) 14:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

Personal interpretation

[edit ]

As someone already commented before, the synopsis section of this article contains an awful lot of original interpretation. If no one objects I will go through and remove content like "The ending reminds one of the graduate" etc (which is most of it). If someone finds some external commentary that can be sourced then feel free to add it appropriately. ArdClose (talk) 10:03, 12 March 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

x rating reserved for "hardcore"? not true

[edit ]

it's simply not true that a rating of X was reserved for hardcore sex movies. Midnight Cowboy famously received and then won the Oscar for best picture. Angel Heart received an X because the camera lingered too long on Mickey Rourke's humping butt on top of Lisa Bonet, so the offending scene was cut, and resubmitted and the film got an R rating instead. Eyes Wide Shut got an X too until it digitally reedited to including people blocking the offending orgy scene. (oh, that wasn't censorship of the recently dead Stanley Kubrick, since the offending matter was still there, but covered . . . LoL.)

porn movies were not submitting to the rating board anyway, and they still aren't. they used XXX instead of X.

it's the association in the public's (confused and misinformed) mind of X as XXX rather than how actual movies were rated.

and a problem that foreign films were more likely to receive an X.

15:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC) Michael Christian

Home Media

[edit ]

The movie is also available on Blu-Ray. http://www.amazon.es/Atame-Blu-ray/dp/B0055KO8NK?SubscriptionId=AKIAIY4YSQJMFDJATNBA&tag=bluraycom06-21&linkCode=xm2&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=B0055KO8NK&m=A1AT7YVPFBWXBL — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.197.47.233 (talk) 20:15, 31 July 2013 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /