Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:The Usos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Usos article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS  · JSTOR · TWL
Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors :

  • [[Cousin#First cousins once removed|first cousins once-removed]] The anchor (#First cousins once removed) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page .
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Biography : Sports and Games
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography , a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject icon College football Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Professional wrestling Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon The Usos is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling , an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to professional wrestling, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

Tamina Snuka

[edit ]

Should'nt she be entitled to her own wikipedia article?(LonerXL (talk) 04:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC))[reply ]

Her article was initally deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarona Snuka. It has since been recreated and deleted on several occasions. In order for an article to stick, you'd have to get the 'delete' decision overturned at WP:DRV. Nici Vampire Heart 09:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC) [reply ]
Did anyone even have a sensible reason for deleting that??(LonerXL (talk) 07:30, 13 January 2011 (UTC))[reply ]
You'd have to ask the people who particiapted in the debate. It's probably important to remember that she hadn't debuted on Raw at the point, however, and had been wrestling for less than two years. Nici Vampire Heart 16:52, 16 January 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

Orphaned references in The Usos

[edit ]
Orphaned references

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of The Usos's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "OWOW":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:52, 24 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Has been remedied. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 05:05, 29 August 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

WWE Tag Champions

[edit ]

They did beat The Hart Dynasty at Night of Champions. It was not a scramble match. So There Tag title should count. They did hold it for a few minutes --68.81.176.14 (talk) 03:54, 27 September 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.81.176.14 (talk) 03:52, 27 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

No they didn't win the Tag Team Championship. It was a Tag Team Turmoil match, aka a Gauntlet match where only the final team remaining won the championship or is recognised as winning the championship. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 21:42, 27 September 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Oh ok. So it is like the scramble match. They where only interm champs for a few minutes but ti doesn't count. My mistake--68.81.176.14 (talk) 20:51, 11 October 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Santa Claus

[edit ]

Was it one of the Usos(Fatus) that was the kid that sat on Santa's lap in December of 1997 just before Stone Cold came down to the ring? TheGary (talk) 13:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

Theme music

[edit ]

Surely the new theme is played after the Siva Tau, thus it succeeds it, not proceeds it? Unless it is actually before it? IanPCP (talk) 20:36, 27 October 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

Alley-Us vs. Alley-Uce

[edit ]

I believe that "Alley-Us" is a misspelling of the name of the move. "Uso" means brother in Samoan, and when it's shorten, it's "Uce". So, I think it should be Alley-Uce. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.50.243.151 (talk) 05:40, 21 February 2012 (UTC) [reply ]

Face Paint

[edit ]

There's no such thing as "tribal Samoan face paint". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.91.188.142 (talk) 03:48, 2 July 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

User: 2604:2000:7111:7E00:59D5:5432:A297:1AB6

[edit ]

He keeps changing it from 2010, when it's clear they were last heels back in 2011. I left a message on his talk page warning him that if he does it again, he'll be reported for vandalism. If anyone else encounters a problem with him, please let me know.Dohvahkiin (talk) 16:06, 8 September 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Describing the Usos

[edit ]

@ClassicOnAStick: @JDC808: you two want to hash out how to describe the members of The Usos here? You've gone back and forth on the Battleground article for days. Cjhard (talk) 00:54, 27 July 2017 (UTC) [reply ]

Re: DtU

[edit ]

Jimmy Uso and Jey Uso does have better ring to it rather than Jey Uso and Jimmy Uso. When you read both variations, out loud, notice how the former has flow to it, while Jey Uso and Jimmy Uso has limited flow. That is my reasoning of my particular variation. For me, it's all about flow. It has so sound good to listen to. Rewind Wrestling (talk) 01:47, 27 July 2017 (UTC) [reply ]

The names are generally always in parenthesis unless singling out one, so flow is not an issue here as it's in parenthesis and all we're doing is listing their names. I am of the opinion that their names should be alphabetical (which I've mentioned in edit summaries in the past) unless their official tag team name does not have it alphabetically. That is not the case here as their tag team name is The Usos, not Jimmy and Jey Uso. Also, we don't really need both last names when listing them in the parenthesis as both are Uso (same thing with The Hardy Boyz, etc.). P.S. This very article does their names alphabetically. --JDC808 ♫ 09:17, 27 July 2017 (UTC) [reply ]

@ClassicOnAStick: How many times do we have to go over this? You continuously change the order of the names without giving an edit summary, despite my explanation above and my edit summaries stating that they should be alphabetical. This is getting old. --JDC808 ♫ 05:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC) [reply ]

Separate articles

[edit ]

At what point do these two deserve separate articles? Just curious Kb5694 (talk) 10:08, 17 February 2019 (UTC) [reply ]

I was wondering the same. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 20:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
They really should get separate articles, I've never liked how twins were always forced to have one page. Jimmy has been doing a lot of solo stuff recently too, was featured on Total Divas, etc. They've done enough stuff on their home to get individual pages and have this be a page about the tag team. 174.125.53.181 (talk) 19:03, 10 May 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

More citations needed

[edit ]

Tagged the page because of missing citations, especially in the career section. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 17:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC) [reply ]

Orphaned references in Jey Uso

[edit ]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Jey Uso's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "PW1":

Reference named "Tedesco":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:35, 14 January 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

Page Spilt

[edit ]

I think it's time to separate the Usos into three pages, Jey Uso, Jimmy Uso, & The Usos, since this page is overloaded and might do single runs depending on what happens this upcoming SmackDown. LIJ4EVA (talk) 19:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Photo

[edit ]

It feels really strange that the photo being used is from 2014, when they havent had that gimmick in 6 years+. Should be fixed, but i don’t know enough about wiki and image rights to do it myself. ThatLoLFanboy (talk) 10:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

why 190.219.215.124 (talk) 16:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Splitting proposal

[edit ]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to split, but keep this page as a tag team.Summerslam2022 (talk) 14:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Now that Jey and Jimmy Uso is splitting up, and now that this article has grown in length, it's time for this page to be split into 2 new articles: Jimmy Uso and Jey Uso. There isnt that much reasons to not separate the pages anymore, other than they shared very similar careers due to being a tag team for most of their careers. Summerslam2022 (talk) 22:41, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

We can't split the article in two because the tag team was a legitimate tag team rather than an alliance. What we can do, however, is create two separate pages for the Usos. It's high time both Usos receive separate pages. TB Chigz (talk) 10:16, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]
That's what i meant, we could keep this page, but create new pages for both Usos. Summerslam2022 (talk) 11:20, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]
@Summerslam2022: You created a proposal for splitting the article. That means deleting this article and creating multiple new ones out of it, not simply creating new articles (which no one can stop you from). I think you misunderstood what splitting means. I'd advise requesting this proposal to be closed since you're not actually proposing a split of the article. Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 04:06, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]
Yeah I feel like each Uso getting their own page is LONG overdue. ToxicRacc (talk) 08:52, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]
I second the decision, but keep the tag team's page as is while Jimmy and Jey get their own articles. Hansen Sebastian Talk 12:22, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support however, keep this page PedigreeWWEFigz87V2 (talk) 12:43, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Accuracy is disputed at this time.

[edit ]

There is a accuracy issue right now on this page. It is over the dates of when The Usos were a tag team. People keep altering it. My opinion on it: They are coming back. If this continues, it may have a factual accuracy being disputed. 2600:1700:9AA2:4540:CC0B:B01A:2ED4:F39F (talk) 00:30, 29 October 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /