Talk:The Mirror Never Lies

WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film . If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm

Taskforce icon

This article is supported by the Southeast Asian cinema task force .

WikiProject icon Indonesia Low‐importance

GA toolbox
Copyvio detector Authorship External links
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Mirror Never Lies/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dwaipayanc (talk · contribs) 04:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC) [reply ]

Will be starting soon.--Dwaipayan (talk) 04:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC) [reply ]

• "... the crew shot on site over a period of two months. There they faced typhoons and large waves, while in the village they had difficulty maneuvering over the wooden walkways and bridges used by the Bajau" So, "on site" does not include the village?
  • Reworded. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:31, 1 March 2013 (UTC) [reply ]

• "who had received two Citra Awards". Wikilink the award?
  • Redirects to Indonesian Film Festival, which is linked below. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:31, 1 March 2013 (UTC) [reply ]

• "The critic Lisabona Rahman, writing on the Indonesian film database" Is it on or in ?
  • For — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:31, 1 March 2013 (UTC) [reply ]

• "... Andini was expressing her desire to be "break away from her..." Is there an extra "be"?
  • D'oh. Done. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:31, 1 March 2013 (UTC) [reply ]

• "... the film was one of the first to address document the Bajau people..." An extra "address".

• D'oh. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:31, 1 March 2013 (UTC) [reply ]

• "... and the "artificial" manner traditional songs were included in the film" Some word s probably missing here.--Dwaipayan (talk) 04:49, 1 March 2013 (UTC) [reply ]
  • How's this? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:31, 1 March 2013 (UTC) [reply ]

• The way in which footnotes are formatted appears somewhat unconventional (authorname, year, workname). It's usually authorname and year, right? So, is this an acceptable style? Do we have examples of such usage in other good articles?
  • It's all using {{cite web }}, {{cite news }}, etc. for the citations proper. The short footnotes have the title too as sometimes a writer writes more than one article in a year (see Kurniasari for an example). Aside from ref formatting not being in the criteria, you can check any of my other GAs and FAs (Terang Boelan , Ruma Maida , Mereka Bilang, Saya Monyet! , ? , and so on) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:06, 1 March 2013 (UTC) [reply ]
• How about a small description (may even be one sentence) of Bajau people (highlighting their maritime nomadic lifestyle)? May be in Production section.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:49, 1 March 2013 (UTC) [reply ]
  • On it. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:06, 1 March 2013 (UTC) [reply ]
    • Done. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:13, 1 March 2013 (UTC) [reply ]

In my opinion, the article meets GA criteria. I randomly checked a few references, including some English translations of Indonesian pages, and those checked out perfectly. --Dwaipayan (talk) 23:03, 5 March 2013 (UTC) [reply ]

• Thanks for the review! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:06, 5 March 2013 (UTC) [reply ]