Talk:Surface of revolution
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by RokerHRO in topic Rotation of an "implicit function"
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.
The integral for the case of the spherical curve with radius r is zero. --78.51.235.70 (talk) 19:22, 8 February 2009 (UTC).Reply
- No, the integral is correct, r can be pulled out and the remaining integral gives 2r.--78.52.220.125 (talk) 16:29, 21 February 2009 (UTC) Reply
For the case of the spherical curve the integral is not correct. x can be pulled out instead of r.
What is the (implicit) 3D formula of a rotated 2D implicit function F(x,y)=0 --RokerHRO (talk) 23:41, 15 March 2016 (UTC) Reply