Talk:StopBadware

WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject icon Organizations Low‐importance

WikiProject icon

Computer security : Computing Low‐importance

WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer security , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer securityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer securityTemplate:WikiProject Computer securityComputer security Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Taskforce icon This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance). Things you can help WikiProject Computer security with: Article alerts are available, updated by AAlertBot. More information... Review importance and quality of existing articles Identify categories related to Computer Security Tag related articles Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests) Identify articles for improvement Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc. Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Should the Staff headline be Level 2? --Mayfare 00:32, 1 September 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

The article now has a big "criticism" section with no citations other than one link to a minor blog. That criticism needs to be supported by citations to reliable sources, or it has to go. See WP:V. --John Nagle (talk) 16:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Can anyone find backup citations for the "Criticism" section? It reads like a rant. Unless some backup appears, I'm going to delete that whole section in a week or so as original research. Thanks. --John Nagle (talk) 18:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

As the manager of StopBadware.org, I can say that much of the criticism section is unfounded. We have certainly received our share of criticism, some legit, some misguided, but I'd hardly call it "broad" or "damning," and many of the facts stated in this section about our process are false. There are also a number of outdated facts elsewhere in the article. For example, our current list of sponsors can be found at [1]. --Maxim Weinstein 15:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxim0512 (talk • contribs)

Deleted the entire "Criticism" section due to lack of sources per WP:V. --John Nagle (talk) 07:06, 27 March 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

(削除) Or so google thinks. [2] lists this page as the second hit, with a big fat warning that wikipedia may harm your computer. Just my 2,ドル and unfortunately original research done by myself 5 minutes ago. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rubik-wuerfel (talk • contribs) 14:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC) (削除ここまで)[reply ]

Edit: Maybe I was too quick... Read the news tomorrow and nevermind --Rubik's Cube (talk) 15:03, 31 January 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

Currently Google lists all websites as malicious. Also the website of stopbadware is not reachable. I'm waiting for their explanation, this seems like a big fuckup on their site. --95.117.224.164 (talk) 15:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

I'd suggest that the google issue was because StopBadware went down, not the reverse... EAi (talk) 16:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

StopBadware.org gets our data from Google, not the other way around. The statement we posted on our blog this morning: http://blog.stopbadware.org/2009/01/31/google-glitch-causes-confusion. - Erica George, StopBadware.org staff —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.26.134 (talk) 17:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on StopBadware. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.stopbadware.org/home/guidelines

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Stopbadware.org's search page now directs people to Google. Their suspicious-URL submission page says that its CAPTCHA is broken and directs people to send e-mail. Formerly, e-mails got both an autoreply and a human response. Now, e-mails get only an auto-reply. Does StopBadware still exist as an independent organization, and if so, then what does it do? 108.31.167.36 (talk) 21:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC) [reply ]

I have put the page into past tense, since the site (using CloudFlare) has been dead (spewing only errors) for the last years, and no other contacts methods seem to have been left behind. If anyone have a better source of the reasons or the context of the closure feel free to share. -- grin ✎ 18:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC) [reply ]