Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:StarCraft (video game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by 207.229.139.154 in topic Reviews
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the StarCraft (video game) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Archives : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Former featured article StarCraft (video game) is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophy This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 26, 2006.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 25, 2005 Peer review Reviewed
October 29, 2005 Good article nominee Listed
November 22, 2005 Featured article candidate Promoted
August 22, 2006 Featured article review Kept
September 22, 2008 Good topic candidate Promoted
February 23, 2011Good topic candidate Promoted
March 19, 2022 Featured article review Demoted
Current status: Former featured article
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Video games : Esports / Nintendo High‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the esports task force .
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Nintendo task force .
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:
AfDs
Merge discussions
Other discussions
No major discussions
Featured content candidates
No featured content candidates
Good article nominations
DYK nominations
No did you know nominations
Reviews and reassessments
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Other talk page banners

WP:URFA/2020

[edit ]
Latest comment: 4 years ago 5 comments5 people in discussion

Reviewing for WP:URFA/2020.

There are a number of dubious sources used in the article, including:

  • CreepColony.com
  • sclegacy.com
  • Soundtrack Collector
  • Game OST
  • MobyGames (listed as unreliable at WP:VGRS)
  • Sjgames.com
  • WP:VGRS says that post-2010 Kotaku stuff is reliable, but there's a 2009 Kotaku piece cited.
  • Openpandora.org
  • Blizzplanet
  • Boardgame Geek
  • There's a ton of primary sources, too: the Business Wire press release, a bunch of Blizzard Entertainment sites, interviews, and official company websites.
  • Writers Club Press is a subsidiary of a self-publishing company, so that author would have to have really good credentials.
  • Formatting issues abound
  • Small amounts of uncited text.

If the sourcing is not improved, this may undergo a featured article review. Hog Farm Bacon 05:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC) Reply

I don't even recognize half of these sources, so this is definitely concerning for a featured article. Le Panini [🥪] 14:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC) Reply
Just want to comment that "sjgames.com" is the website of Steve Jackson Games. BOZ (talk) 16:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC) Reply
Updated the sjgames ref to properly show that it's referencing SJG's magazine Pyramid. The other sources listed do remain questionable-at-best though.--Alexandra IDV 23:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC) Reply

@Hog Farm, Le Panini, Alexandra IDV, and BOZ: The above sources are still in the article, and I imagine some research will have to be done to find new sources for the information they verify or remove the information all together. Is anyone interested in fixing up the article? If not, would you be willing to bring this to WP:FAR? I am at my 5 article limit for nominating articles at FAR (and I think Hog Farm is, too) but I am happy to help if someone else wants to nominate this. Please ping me if you have any questions. Z1720 (talk) 02:06, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Reply

Reviews

[edit ]
Latest comment: 3 years ago 1 comment1 person in discussion

207.229.139.154 (talk) 12:25, 21 May 2023 (UTC) Reply

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /