Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Song of the South

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Song of the South article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3 Auto-archiving period: 2 months
Former good article nominee Song of the South was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 2, 2007 Good article nominee Not listed
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film . If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force .
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Animated films task force .
WikiProject icon Animation : American / Films High‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation , a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject icon Disney High‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

More on the racism controversy

[edit ]

I would like to see gobs more about claims and counterclaims about whether the movie should be condemned as racist.

One persistent notion is that it portrays slaves as happy and contented - due to the lack of clarity as to the time period. There is nothing in the film that definitively asserts that it takes place after the Civil War when all slaves were freed. (One has to infer from the fact that Uncle Remus is permitted to run away with no chase or other consequences that he wasn't a slave.) Saying in separate statements (but not on screen) that it took place in the Reconstruction Era has not satisfied critics who say the film glorifies slavery.

We should name a few of the "it's racist because it glorifies slavery" critics and summarize their reasoning; then, we can also provide a few rebuttals (from the Walt Disney company and others).

Also, the black English spoken by Uncle Remus and other plantation residents is an issue. Did blacks ever really speak this way? Even if they did, is it (somehow) racist to portray them as using substandard (or colloquial) English? Who says so, and why? Then, rebuttals from the other side.

This film isn't just notable for being a period drama or for its innovative combination of animation and live action. It's one of the few "banned" films or books. It raises the question of whether good intentions justify language, plot, or appearance - much like the furor over Little Black Sambo, which some people say increased their respect for brown-skinned people as clever, resourceful, and prosperous -- but which others found inexcusably demeaning because of the hairstyles and names. Uncle Ed (talk) 16:18, 15 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I concur that there could be more content. The "Bibliography" section seems to indicate books that could be mined more thoroughly, like the Sperb reference is only tied to one sentence. Google Scholar here shows a lot of academic critique too (probably more without the allintitle: query). Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 16:58, 15 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Actually, there is full access to the Sperb book on Project MUSE through WP:LIBRARY! Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 17:13, 15 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /