Talk:Sheathbill
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. | |
Untitled
[edit ]reverted last edit becuase it uninentially made things worse than before. jimfbleak 16:17, 12 May 2005 (UTC) [reply ]
Genus/family
[edit ]I'm not convinced that the sheathbills are best described as a genus. They are a family with a single genus. Genera are a dime a dozen, while the sheathbills as a family are interesting as they are the only endemic family in Antarctica. Any thoughts? Sabine's Sunbird 22:38, 12 May 2005 (UTC) [reply ]
- Bird genera are indeed a dime a dozen. However, I don't understand what the problem is here. These two species are in the one monotypic genus of their family. - UtherSRG 14:09, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
- It's been better worded since I made my comment. Sabine's Sunbird 15:09, 13 May 2005 (UTC) [reply ]
Kelp
[edit ]Kelp links here with "Kelp pigeon". Is this a common name for the bird? FireWorks 19:15, 29 December 2005 (UTC) [reply ]