Talk:Self-invested personal pension
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
- Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
- New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
- Assume good faith
- Be polite and avoid personal attacks
- Be welcoming to newcomers
- Seek dispute resolution if needed
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Question
[edit ]Maybe some mention of how the U-turn over property being allowed into SIPPS may affect the uk housing market confidence is called for here? - TomRobinson 09:53, 7 December 2005 (UTC) [reply ]
- I'm not entirely sure its warranted. While the housing market may not have extra fuel injected, there already exist several major structural tax benefits to keep the housing market up, as well as the fact that the UK continues to make too few houses, as compared to the level of household formation. However, these may be some effect, but I think we should wait and see. Cheers, Nick Kerr 15:08, 12 December 2005 (UTC) [reply ]
the full range of HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) approved investments
[edit ]This phrase reads like a brochure. It should say what the investments are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 18:31, 14 June 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
Links
[edit ]Please ensure that the links you have provided are correct. I have counted 4 'broken' links.
Assessment comment
[edit ]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Self-invested personal pension/Comments , and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
The article is a start class because it doesn't state it's notability in a impact section or give sign of the what kind of numbers in regards to people or money to which this article encompasses. The article could also use more references.EECavazos 04:14, 14 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
==WP Tax Priority==
Low priority because the article doesn't state its importance, so it may very well be a low impact article especially in regards to taxation. The article needs more tax content to raise its wp tax priority to mid.EECavazos 04:15, 14 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]Last edited at 04:15, 14 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 05:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)