Talk:Second Harbour Crossing, Auckland
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Auckland , which aims to improve the coverage of Auckland, New Zealand, on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.AucklandWikipedia:WikiProject AucklandTemplate:WikiProject AucklandWikiProject Auckland
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Name
[edit ]The name "Second Harbour Crossing" is very ambiguous and could refer to any city's second harbour crossing - the Sydney Harbour Tunnel or the Eastern Harbour Crossing in Hong Kong, for example could be seen as "Second Harbour Crossing"s. Is there a better title to use for this? JRG (talk) 00:47, 12 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- It COULD be the "Second Harbour Crossing, Auckland". However, the term is NOT ambiguous in New Zealand (it's the official working title, including in government documents), and according to Wikipedia logic, we don't need to append qualifiers unless there's different articles with the same title. Ingolfson (talk) 15:24, 15 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- I have reconsidered and moved it. Ingolfson (talk) 15:30, 15 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Ok - thanks - I thought your points above were legitimate anyway and would have accepted that it not be moved - I've argued the same thing for an Australian site which was much more well known but was moved anyway. JRG (talk) 03:11, 19 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Second crossing could refer to any harbour with one crossing!
The background section begins 1969. But debate began before that, and should really include reference to all proposals for bridges over the harbour - which go back to the 1920's.203.184.41.226 (talk) 19:12, 23 March 2013 (UTC) [reply ]