Talk:Scientific study
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
NPOV
[edit ]- The article only has negative references to science. These should be moved into a possibly new article about problems of scientific study (see Scientific_method#Problems_and_issues. The article can be redirected as it had at the beginning, to Scientific method, or a much more balanced treatment added to the content.
- A scientific study is not just for medicine.
Dpleibovitz (talk) 18:22, 21 July 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
- @Dpleibovitz: I've redirected it back to Scientific method in general, since that's what "scientific study" uses, or at least is supposed to use. Hope that's OK. (The article between the original redirect and my redirect was a stub created by a sockpuppet anyway.) --Closeapple (talk) 04:33, 26 December 2014 (UTC) [reply ]