Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Scarcity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scarcity article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Economics High‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Air is not scarce at all.

[edit ]

This line, "For example, although air is more important to us than gold, it is less scarce simply because the production cost of air is zero." Should be edited to say, "For example, although air is more important to us than gold, it does not have scarcity because the production cost of air is zero."

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit ]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:36, 9 September 2019 (UTC) [reply ]

Suggestion:Proposal to move article to Scarcity (economics)

[edit ]

Seems unwieldy to see all these page titles with scarcity in them without the benefit of a disambiguation page. This page is clearly about an economic concept, why not retitle it (Move it) to Scarcity (economics) like the Scarcity (social psychology) article? I will also develop the disambiguation page to go with this. Also, propose to move the book reference to the see also section. (A bit commercialistic the way it's laid out as part of the lead.)

Cheers, Risk Engineer (talk) 15:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /