Talk:Saxon Shore
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
- Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
- New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
- Assume good faith
- Be polite and avoid personal attacks
- Be welcoming to newcomers
- Seek dispute resolution if needed
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
Purpose
[edit ]It's not clear that the supplying of the army of Julian with grain from Britain in 359,[7] or the landings by Count Theodosius in 367-68 was directly related to the Saxon Shore forts, nor that if they were that would preclude the forts being designed principally for use against seaborne raiders. There is also the suggestive title of the command. Too many references here are to primary sources. Deipnosophista (talk) 16:45, 20 March 2013 (UTC) [reply ]
- Agreed. I've tagged one section extensively about this. -HammerFilmFan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.25.27 (talk) 17:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC) [reply ]
Source from 1849?
[edit ]For this section:
"The only contemporary reference we possess that mentions the name 'Saxon Shore' comes in the late 4th century Notitia Dignitatum , which lists its commander, the Comes Litoris Saxonici per Britanniam ("Count of the Saxon Shore in Britain"), and gives the names of the sites under his command and their respective complements of military personnel."
I was just reading The Saxons in England pages 13-14 (first new paragraph) and it seems to fit, so would it be a good secondary source? It's from 1849 so it's not the most modern one out there. I'm New to Wikipedia editing so I don't know and didn't want to presume edit anything. Penbaggins (talk) 19:48, 14 November 2022 (UTC) [reply ]
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class fortifications articles
- Fortifications task force articles
- C-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class Roman and Byzantine military history articles
- Roman and Byzantine military history task force articles
- C-Class Classical warfare articles
- Classical warfare task force articles
- C-Class Archaeology articles
- Low-importance Archaeology articles
- C-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Low-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- C-Class France articles
- Low-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- C-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles