Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Satellite (Bebe Rexha and Snoop Dogg song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Satellite (Bebe Rexha and Snoop Dogg song) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS  · JSTOR · TWL
[画像:Good articles] Satellite (Bebe Rexha and Snoop Dogg song) was nominated as a Music good article , but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 22, 2024, reviewed version ). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Albania Low‐importance
WikiProject icon Satellite (Bebe Rexha and Snoop Dogg song) is part of the WikiProject Albania , an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Pop music Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

[edit ]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Satellite (Bebe Rexha and Snoop Dogg song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ZombiUwU (talk · contribs) 02:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]


Hey Iaof2017, I will be conducting this GA review. I'll ping you in a few days when I have a completed review or have most of it done. I'll be doing it in chunks so you'll see me adding some stuff as I go. Also - I'll be doing some copyediting as I go, so please check my edit logs and revert anything you disagree with. I look forward to working with you. FYI this might take a few days. Thanks! ZombiUwU ♥ (🌸 ~♥~ 📝) 02:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

ZombiUwU do you intend to continue this review? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
As both nominator and reviewer are inactive, I am closing this GA nomination. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

General Comments

[edit ]

Lead

[edit ]

Background and composition

[edit ]

Reception

[edit ]

Track listing

[edit ]

Charts

[edit ]

Release history

[edit ]

Music video and promotion

[edit ]

Source and Citation Spot Check

[edit ]

Plagiarism check

[edit ]

No obvious plagiarism [1]

Chart

[edit ]
My chart of many things
Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral : it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /