Talk:Sageworks
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sageworks article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
- Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
- New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
- Assume good faith
- Be polite and avoid personal attacks
- Be welcoming to newcomers
- Seek dispute resolution if needed
Article policies
Proposed deletion This page was proposed for deletion by Bradv (talk · contribs) on 19 April 2010 with the comment:
Non-notable company. Fails criteria set forth in WP:CORP.
It was contested by Mdascola (talk · contribs) on 2010年04月30日 with the comment:
(Mdascola blocked as a sockpuppet, and COI likely)(削除) Non-notable company." I stumbled across this today and found it odd that it was deleted. This company is an industry data provider and has been quoted in news sources around the United States: [links omitted] There are countless articles about this company being a data provider over the years. Time, Inc, Bloomberg, The Wall Street Journal, Reuters, and many other publishing companies use Sageworks industry data because it IS a notable company. (削除ここまで)
Non-notable company. Fails criteria set forth in WP:CORP.
It was contested by Mdascola (talk · contribs) on 2010年04月30日 with the comment:
(Mdascola blocked as a sockpuppet, and COI likely)
Proposed deletion This page was proposed for deletion by DGG (talk · contribs) on 18 May 2014 with the comment:
Insufficient evidence of notability -- fastest growing = "not yet notable"
It was contested by Jackochs13 (talk · contribs) on 2014年05月28日 with the comment:
(Jackochs13 blocked as a sockpuppet, and COI likely)(削除) Hi Ron, hope this finds you well. I just noticed that you've removed Sageworks page. I'd like to object to this deletion, on grounds that the company is notable. Can you please restore this, as there is notability which I would have liked to defend before it's deletion/PROD expiration? Thanks very much. (削除ここまで)
Insufficient evidence of notability -- fastest growing = "not yet notable"
It was contested by Jackochs13 (talk · contribs) on 2014年05月28日 with the comment:
(Jackochs13 blocked as a sockpuppet, and COI likely)
Proposed deletion This page was proposed for deletion by Harald Forkbeard (talk · contribs) on 10 January 2015 with the comment:
self-promotional article by a non-notable company
It was contested by Cryptic (talk · contribs) on 2015年01月17日 with the comment:
Can't be prodded, as it's been done previously (twice). Strongly suggest AFD.
self-promotional article by a non-notable company
It was contested by Cryptic (talk · contribs) on 2015年01月17日 with the comment:
Can't be prodded, as it's been done previously (twice). Strongly suggest AFD.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 18 January 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law , an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. | |||||||||||||||
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
- 16912 Rhiannon (talk · contribs) has been paid by Beutler Ink on behalf of Sageworks.
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
Edits made by the below user(s) were last checked for neutrality on 31-12-2016 by Example.
Edits made by the below user(s) were last checked for neutrality on 31-12-2016 by Example.
- Sageworksinc (talk · contribs) has been paid by Sageworks. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Blocked per WP:USERNAME
- 77 woodmont (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown. Their editing has included contributions to this article. SOCK per WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Sageworksinc
- Roamingeditor222226 (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. SOCK per WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Sageworksinc
- Entrepreneurship58039 (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. SOCK per WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Sageworksinc
- Jackochs13 (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. SOCK per WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Sageworksinc
- Bankingeditor (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. SOCK per WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Sageworksinc
- Financepro123 (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. SOCK per WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Sageworksinc
Start a discussion about improving the Sageworks page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Sageworks" page.
Categories:
- Stub-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class North Carolina articles
- Low-importance North Carolina articles
- WikiProject North Carolina articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions
- Paid contributions with no listed employer